Examining the effect of practice on inhibition of return in static displays

Pratt, Jay; McAuliffe, Jim

doi:10.3758/bf03205543

Cited by 25 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers should keep in mind that Prediction 4 requires the change in stimulus to be unexpected. Pratt and McAuliffe (1999) presented multiple trials with a particular cue and target identity. In the last block, they swapped the cue and target identity to remove any previously accumulated habituation, but they failed to observe any decrease in IOR with a change in the stimuli.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as

Dukewich

2009

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as

Dukewich

2009

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…At least with manual responses, it appears that object-and environment-based IOR may vanish after extended training (Weaver et al 1998). Still, eVects of practice on environment-based IOR were not replicated in a series of three experiments (Pratt and McAuliVe 1999).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Involuntary cueing effects during smooth pursuit: facilitation and inhibition of return in oculocentric coordinates

Souto

Kerzel

2008

Exp Brain Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peripheral cues induce facilitation with short cue-target intervals and inhibition of return (IOR) with long cue-target intervals. Modulations of facilitation and IOR by continuous displacements of the eye or the cued stimuli are poorly understood. Previously, the retinal coordinates of the cued location were changed by saccadic or smooth pursuit eye movements during the cue-target interval. In contrast, we probed the relevant coordinates for facilitation and IOR by orthogonally varying object motion (stationary, moving) and eye movement (Wxation, smooth pursuit). In the pursuit conditions, cue and target were presented during the ongoing eye movement and observers made a saccade to the target. Importantly, we found facilitation and IOR of similar size during smooth pursuit and Wxation. The results suggest that involuntary orienting is possible even when attention has to be allocated to the moving target during smooth pursuit. Comparison of conditions with stabilized and moving objects suggest an oculocentric basis for facilitation as well as inhibition. Facilitation and IOR were reduced with objects that moved on the retina both with smooth pursuit and eye Wxation.

show abstract

“…It is routine to eschew monitoring eye movements under these conditions unless there is some additional incentive for subjects to move their eyes. For example, in a thorough study of practice effects in inhibition of return, using similar stimuli, Pratt and McAuliffe (1999) did not monitor eye movements in any of their three experiments, even for CTOAs of over 1 sec. The second argument is that we have measured eye movements in other, very similar experiments with both short and long CTOAs, which yielded the same basic pattern of results (means are presented in the Discussion section), and found that eye movements occurred on fewer than 1% of the trials (Richard, 1999).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Goal-driven modulation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays

Richard

Wright

Ward

2003

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Six location-cuing experiments were conducted to examine the goal-driven control of attentional capture in multiple-cue displays. In most of the experiments, the cue display consisted of the simultaneous presentation of a red direct cue that was highly predictive of the target location (the unique cue) and three gray direct cues (the standard cues) that were not predictive of the location. The results indicated that although target responses were faster at all cued locations relative to uncued locations, they were significantly faster at the unique-cue location than at the standard-cue locations. Other results suggest that the faster responses produced by direct cues may be associated with two different components: an attention-relatedcomponent that can be modulated by goal-driven factors and a nonattentional component that occurs in parallel at multiple direct-cue locations and is minimally affected by the same goal-driven factors.

show abstract

Examining the effect of practice on inhibition of return in static displays

Cited by 25 publications

References 19 publications

Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as

Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as

Involuntary cueing effects during smooth pursuit: facilitation and inhibition of return in oculocentric coordinates

Goal-driven modulation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About