Using Multimodal Representations to Support Learning in the Science Classroom 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16450-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Impact of Multimodal Representation Instruction on Students’ Learning of Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In effect, the authors concluded that "understanding learning with multiple representations requires an understanding of the pragmatics of joint action, of how the body and the materials come to amalgamate as a unitary situation in the learner's experience" (p. 398); providing new understandings of how students learn from multiple representations and multiple modalities in classroom settings. Similar results were obtained by Nam and Cho (2016) who found that students' writing and conceptual understanding in science improved significantly as a consequence of learning how different multimodal representations could be represented, interpreted, and applied to communicate their understandings of scientific concepts. Wilson and Bradbury (2016) reported on how two first grade teachers taught a science unit on carnivorous plants using a multimodal 5E model of inquiry (Bybee, 2006) that engaged the students in using a variety of semiotic tools; such as, viewing physical specimens, viewing videos and reading, writing and drawing about these plants.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In effect, the authors concluded that "understanding learning with multiple representations requires an understanding of the pragmatics of joint action, of how the body and the materials come to amalgamate as a unitary situation in the learner's experience" (p. 398); providing new understandings of how students learn from multiple representations and multiple modalities in classroom settings. Similar results were obtained by Nam and Cho (2016) who found that students' writing and conceptual understanding in science improved significantly as a consequence of learning how different multimodal representations could be represented, interpreted, and applied to communicate their understandings of scientific concepts. Wilson and Bradbury (2016) reported on how two first grade teachers taught a science unit on carnivorous plants using a multimodal 5E model of inquiry (Bybee, 2006) that engaged the students in using a variety of semiotic tools; such as, viewing physical specimens, viewing videos and reading, writing and drawing about these plants.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Multimodal representations can be defined as the expression of scientific ideas using a vector of expressive modalities that include for example text, images, graphs, chemical symbols, mathematical equations, audio, and/or animations . Research in this area has supported the claim that multimodal representations, when designed well, help students deepen their understanding of abstract scientific concepts and help them express scientific ideas. Here, we used MR to supplement the laboratory learning environment with graphics and text that support the subject content (Figure A) and animations of otherwise invisible chemical and physical processes, such as the chemical reactions that occurs inside a plasma generating chamber, an instrument that students learn to use in the course (Figure B). Students can also overlay this animation next to the real instrument.…”
Section: Design Of the Aletha Hololens Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ezzeldin (2017), utilizing graphic organizers to construct a structure of prior knowledge assists students to fine-tune their brains for the subject they are going to learn. In additionally, visual organizers provide cues that assist students in retrieving previously stored knowledge (Gunel et al, 2016;Nam & Cho, 2016;Thakur et al, 2017). As students studied by reviewing previously stored knowledge in a spatial fashion utilizing an earlier studied graphic organizer, they were able to recover material that had been committed to memory thanks to the graphic organizer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students who learn content with visual organizers do not focus on generating accurate correlations or memorizing certain conceptual truths. Rather than that, the emphasis is on the linkages between facts in larger groups and the connections between ideas (Gunel et al, 2016;Nam & Cho, 2016;Thakur et al, 2017). Furthermore, according to Knoll et al (2017), by splitting and organizing new stimuli into specified segments, graphic organizers are efficient educational aids for supporting students in refining their perception of stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%