2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the theory/practice relation in a high school science register: A functional linguistic perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, understandings of metalanguage within systemic functional linguistics (SFL; Halliday & Matthiessen, ; Rose & Martin, ; Schleppegrell, ) include terminology for connecting both structural and functional units of language systematically to their meaning‐making potential in particular contexts of learning. Functional metalanguages, mediated through explicit scaffolded pedagogies and based on the principle of high challenge, high support (Mariani, ), have been adopted in a wide range of TESOL contexts to engage learners at all phases of language development (de Silva Joyce & Feez, ; Emilia, ; Mohan & Slater, ; Schleppegrell, ). Despite challenges in recontextualising SFL terminology for pedagogic purposes (Bourke, ), the use of functional metalanguage has enabled the criteria for writing performance to be made visible to students in classroom instruction, assessment, and feedback, and facilitated schoolwide approaches to literacy (Caulkins, Ehrenworth, & Lehman, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, understandings of metalanguage within systemic functional linguistics (SFL; Halliday & Matthiessen, ; Rose & Martin, ; Schleppegrell, ) include terminology for connecting both structural and functional units of language systematically to their meaning‐making potential in particular contexts of learning. Functional metalanguages, mediated through explicit scaffolded pedagogies and based on the principle of high challenge, high support (Mariani, ), have been adopted in a wide range of TESOL contexts to engage learners at all phases of language development (de Silva Joyce & Feez, ; Emilia, ; Mohan & Slater, ; Schleppegrell, ). Despite challenges in recontextualising SFL terminology for pedagogic purposes (Bourke, ), the use of functional metalanguage has enabled the criteria for writing performance to be made visible to students in classroom instruction, assessment, and feedback, and facilitated schoolwide approaches to literacy (Caulkins, Ehrenworth, & Lehman, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underlined text, here and in the following excerpt, denotes the knowledge structure of evaluation as consistent with Mohan and Slater (2006) and Slater and Mohan (2010).…”
Section: Task 2: Online Chat Room Vs Online Voipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a third perspective, there are studies that focus on the linguistic processes that are involved in science instruction, examining whether inquiry-based science instruction promotes scientific discourse and/or English language proficiency (e.g., Kelly and Breton, 2001;Mohan & Slater, 2001). In this context, some studies have shown that combining inquiry science with literacy is particularly powerful in helping students to understand science content and to develop English language proficiency.…”
Section: Research On Science Instruction With English Language Learnementioning
confidence: 99%