Examining water and gender narratives and realities

Abstract

There is a wealth of scholarly knowledge that aims to disentangle the complex relationship between gender and water. This scholarship coupled with practitioners' collective experiences and insights have resulted in the emergence of certain narratives that describe how unequal gender relationships to water are manifested and how they can be addressed. In this paper, we critically examine four of these water and gender narratives, myths, or realities: Are women solely responsible for water collection? Are women excluded from the global water workforce? Is technology is sufficient enough to solve water‐related gender inequalities? Does participation in design and implementation of water services address gender inequalities? By reviewing existing evidence underlying these water and gender narratives that are prominent in much academic research and international programming, we show the nuances of water and gender relationships, and the discrepancies upon which these narratives are grounded. We draw on examples and research largely focusing on the Global South, but highlight a need for similar examination of these narratives in the Global North. Finally, we discuss remaining knowledge gaps and argue that these normative understandings overlook limited and potentially contradicting evidence on the intricacies of the relationship between gender and water. This article is categorized under: Human Water > Water Governance Human Water > Water as Imagined and Represented Engineering Water > Water, Health, and Sanitation

Understanding perceived climate risks to household water supply and their implications for adaptation: evidence from California

“…Observed differences are even more pronounced for women. These results align with existing research documenting persistent gender differences in water access and concern globally (Harris et al 2017;Dickin and Caretta 2022), but this finding could also reflect differential risk perception/reporting of impacts as has been found in several previous studies (Mooney et al 2021). While very limitedly represented in our survey and therefore subject to significant uncertainty, genderqueer and non-binary individuals have the highest rate of reported household water supply impacts (77%).…”

Homelessness and water insecurity in the Global North: Trapped in the dwelling paradox

“…Considerable time is spent on procuring water: for example, a study in Los Angeles found that unhoused people spent up to 2 h trying to access water services (Avelar Portillo, 2021). Research shows that when households lack convenient water supply, the burden of procuring, transporting, and managing water falls disproportionately on women and children (Dickin & Caretta, 2022) and the emerging literature thus far indicates the same is true for unhoused communities (DeMyers et al, 2017).…”

Systematic mapping of gender equality and social inclusion in WASH interventions: knowledge clusters and gaps

“… 1 2 Due to gendered norms and practices related to water, women and girls bear the burden of water fetching and management within the household in many countries. 3 4 This is linked to health outcomes such as musculoskeletal injuries, 5 psychosocial stress 6 7 and gender-based violence. 8 This unpaid work can also be extremely time-consuming, constraining time for productive, educational or leisure activities.…”

“…Poor access to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services threatens public health and contributes to gender and social inequalities 1 2. Due to gendered norms and practices related to water, women and girls bear the burden of water fetching and management within the household in many countries 3 4. This is linked to health outcomes such as musculoskeletal injuries,5 psychosocial stress6 7 and gender-based violence 8.…”