2008
DOI: 10.1142/s021988780800334x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examples of Derivation-Based Differential Calculi Related to Noncommutative Gauge Theories

Abstract: Some derivation-based differential calculi which have been used to construct models of noncommutative gauge theories are presented and commented. Some comparisons between them are made.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [4] a general and purely algebraic framework to associate to A a differential calculus was introduced. This approach was named the derivation-based differential calculus and has been further developed in [5,6], see also the reviews [7,8,9].…”
Section: Preliminaries On Derivation-based Differential Calculimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [4] a general and purely algebraic framework to associate to A a differential calculus was introduced. This approach was named the derivation-based differential calculus and has been further developed in [5,6], see also the reviews [7,8,9].…”
Section: Preliminaries On Derivation-based Differential Calculimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are examples showing that there is also a gauge copy problem in noncommutative geometry, see e.g. Proposition 3 in this paper, where we review some results of [10,7,8,9]. This means that considering only observables which are constructed from the curvature, we can in general not extract the complete gauge invariant information of the connection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The statement and proof require the detailed theory of roots and weights for semisimple Lie groups and their representations, and we prefer to state our main result (Theorem 4.1) after we have established our notation and conventions for this detailed theory. The particular case in which G = SU (n) and π is the defining representation of G on C n was treated earlier in [11,10,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the derivations are defined by (1.16) (see [5,36,46]). We leave the remaining cases to a further work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%