1992
DOI: 10.1190/1.1443271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examples of reverse‐time migration of single‐channel, ground‐penetrating radar profiles

Abstract: A single-channel, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) profile portrays a distorted, unfocused image of subsurface structure due to apparent position shifts associated with dipping reflectors and to diffractions from corners and edges. A focused image may be produced from such data by using any of the migration algorithms previously developed for seismic data; we use reverse-time migration based on the scalar wave equation. Field work was performed over a simple stratigraphic soil sequence and a complicated fluvial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As long as precise amplitude reconstruction is not a primary interest (e.g., we are only measuring wavefield kinematics) and with the basic assumption that the subsurface electric properties are independent of frequency, many of the migration algorithms developed for seismic data analysis can be applied directly to GPR data without modification. While not generally true, the assumption of frequency-independent material properties is a reasonable first-order approximation in most cases, and often good migration results are obtained with any of the standard migration tools (Fisher et al, 1992a;Fisher et al, 1992b;Bradford et al, 1996;Bradford and Loughridge, 2003;Pipan et al, 2003;Bradford and Harper, 2005).…”
Section: Review Of Prestack Depth Migration Velocity Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As long as precise amplitude reconstruction is not a primary interest (e.g., we are only measuring wavefield kinematics) and with the basic assumption that the subsurface electric properties are independent of frequency, many of the migration algorithms developed for seismic data analysis can be applied directly to GPR data without modification. While not generally true, the assumption of frequency-independent material properties is a reasonable first-order approximation in most cases, and often good migration results are obtained with any of the standard migration tools (Fisher et al, 1992a;Fisher et al, 1992b;Bradford et al, 1996;Bradford and Loughridge, 2003;Pipan et al, 2003;Bradford and Harper, 2005).…”
Section: Review Of Prestack Depth Migration Velocity Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all of these efforts, traveltime information is exploited in standard scalar imaging techniques ͑e.g., Gazdag, 1978;Stolt, 1978;Curlander and McDonough, 1991;Fisher et al, 1992b͒. Essentially, only arrival time, or phase, information is exploited; amplitude decay or radiation patterns of the antennas used are not properly accounted for.…”
Section: Ground-coupled Antennasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous multi-offset data or multi-fold data acquisition is analogous to commonmidpoint (CMP) data acquisition in seismic reflection (Yilmaz, 2001). While these acquisition and processing methodologies are more labor intensive and time consuming, the advantages in improving the quality of GPR images are well documented Fisher et al, 1992a;Fisher et al, 1992b;. Additionally, multi-fold data enable detailed measurement of both lateral and vertical permittivity variations using velocity analysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%