2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.00010
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exceptionally bright optical emission from a rare and distant $γ-$ray burst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We noticed that these values are well in agreement with the observed values (𝛼 𝑥 = 0.95 ± 0.01 and 𝛼 𝑜 = 0.61 ± 0.04). However Oganesyan et al (2021) considered similar values (without host galaxy reddening correction) of optical/X-ray spectral indices (𝛽 𝑥 =𝛽 𝑜 =0.9) and claimed that at least before the jet break phase the observed 𝜈 𝑐 is above the X-ray band, which is inconsistent with our findings and are ruled out by our SED fitting (see § 4.2.2). Additionally we also implemented the "closure relations" post jet break phase and noticed that 𝜈 𝑐 follows the typical evolution predicted post jet break phase (i.e.…”
Section: Closure Relations and Cooling Break Frequencycontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We noticed that these values are well in agreement with the observed values (𝛼 𝑥 = 0.95 ± 0.01 and 𝛼 𝑜 = 0.61 ± 0.04). However Oganesyan et al (2021) considered similar values (without host galaxy reddening correction) of optical/X-ray spectral indices (𝛽 𝑥 =𝛽 𝑜 =0.9) and claimed that at least before the jet break phase the observed 𝜈 𝑐 is above the X-ray band, which is inconsistent with our findings and are ruled out by our SED fitting (see § 4.2.2). Additionally we also implemented the "closure relations" post jet break phase and noticed that 𝜈 𝑐 follows the typical evolution predicted post jet break phase (i.e.…”
Section: Closure Relations and Cooling Break Frequencycontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The broadband afterglow behaviour of GRBs could be understood either indirectly through empirical fitting constraining the temporal and spectral indices (closure relationship) or directly through external shock fireball modelling. Here, we have explored the empirical fitting method to understand the nature of the late-time broadband afterglow emission of GRB 210619B and have compared it with the afterglow results reported by Oganesyan et al (2021).…”
Section: Broadband Afterglowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atteia (2021) noted the probability of a lensed visible afterglow in the following months due to this intervening system. Oganesyan et al (2021) combined multifilter optical observations together with X-ray and γ-ray data to model the emission of the GRB. They disentangled the contributions of the reverse and forward shocks and argued that the GRB multiwavelength emission is produced by a narrow, highly magnetized jet propagating in a sparse environment, with an approximate jet-break time at ∼10 4 s. A comparison between the optical and X-ray data shows evidence of a secondary component of radiation in the jet wings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations were carried out synchronously in four channels with the temporal resolutions of 1, 5, 10 and 30 s in the B,V bands and in white light. The scientific details on this discovery are presented in our special study [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%