2022
DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5683.20.05349-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excess all-cause mortality during COVID-19 outbreak: potential role of untreated cardiovascular disease

Abstract: The final version may contain major or minor changes.Subscription: Information about subscribing to Minerva Medica journals is online at: http://www.minervamedica.it/en/how-to-order-journals.php Reprints and permissions: For information about reprints and permissions send an email to:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 30 peer-reviewed publications (96.8%) (10, 27-49, 51-56) and 1 pre-print (3.2%) (10). There were 30 (96.8%) cohort observational studies (10,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56), and 1 (3.2%) case-control (47) observational study with no randomized control trials. Research ethics board (REB) approval and consent were obtained in 6 (19.4%) studies (29, 36, 37, 45, 50, 53), 14 (45.2%) studies (10, 32, 35, 38-44, 47-49, 54) stated formal ethics approval was not required or the study was exempted while 11 (35.2%) studies (27,28,30,33,34,46, 51, 52, 54-56) did not report REB approval or were not applicable (stated as none with no explanation).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 30 peer-reviewed publications (96.8%) (10, 27-49, 51-56) and 1 pre-print (3.2%) (10). There were 30 (96.8%) cohort observational studies (10,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56), and 1 (3.2%) case-control (47) observational study with no randomized control trials. Research ethics board (REB) approval and consent were obtained in 6 (19.4%) studies (29, 36, 37, 45, 50, 53), 14 (45.2%) studies (10, 32, 35, 38-44, 47-49, 54) stated formal ethics approval was not required or the study was exempted while 11 (35.2%) studies (27,28,30,33,34,46, 51, 52, 54-56) did not report REB approval or were not applicable (stated as none with no explanation).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%