2018
DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excess Cost of Cervical Cancer Screening Beyond Recommended Screening Ages or After Hysterectomy in a Single Institution

Abstract: Guideline nonadherent cervical cancer screening in women beyond the recommended screening ages and posthysterectomy resulted in costs exceeding US $160,000 for screening, diagnostic tests, and follow-up with minimal improvement in detection of high-grade dysplasia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 29 Lastly, false-positive screening tests add cost to the health care system with minimal additional health benefit. 30 To date, HPV primary or cotesting has not been recommended in the youngest screening age group because of a high infection prevalence with subsequent clearance. However, as vaccination against HPV increases and the prevalence of HPV infection decreases, incorporation of HPV testing in this age group may need to be reconsidered, with focus on its negative predictive value (ie, identification of individuals at the lowest risk of CIN 2 or a more severe diagnosis) to identify a group requiring the least intensive screening strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 29 Lastly, false-positive screening tests add cost to the health care system with minimal additional health benefit. 30 To date, HPV primary or cotesting has not been recommended in the youngest screening age group because of a high infection prevalence with subsequent clearance. However, as vaccination against HPV increases and the prevalence of HPV infection decreases, incorporation of HPV testing in this age group may need to be reconsidered, with focus on its negative predictive value (ie, identification of individuals at the lowest risk of CIN 2 or a more severe diagnosis) to identify a group requiring the least intensive screening strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Lastly, false-positive screening tests add cost to the health care system with minimal additional health benefit. 30 However, it is notable that in 2020 there were still states where vaccination coverage among female residents was less than 50%. 13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Emerging evidence suggests cervical cancer is caused by genetic and epigenetic changes as well as different kinds of environmental factors [1,2]. Advances in cervical cancer therapy over the past decade have enhanced patient outcomes, and the 5-year survival rate of cervical cancer patients has been dramatically improved [3]. However, the outcome remains poor and most of them died of long-term metastases eventually [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overuse of screening tests for cancer has also been documented 14. Examples include inappropriate screening for cervical cancer,15 mammography screening for breast cancer16 17 and thyroid cancer screening 18–20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%