2015
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2015.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excess Length of Stay Attributable to Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) in the Acute Care Setting: A Multistate Model

Abstract: Background. Evaluation of the economic impact of interventions designed to reduce the incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) depends on accurate estimates of healthcare resource use attributable to infection. Studies that do not account for the timing of infection overestimate attributable length of stay (LOS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the excess LOS due to CDI using a multi-state model Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients hospitalized on a general med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
34
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest impact on LOS occurred among patients with severe CDI. The excess LOS for mild-to-moderate CDI was 0.75 days (95% CI: 0.59 - 0.89), and for severe CDI, it was 4.11 days (95% CI: 3.90 - 4.32) [23]. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients with CDI in particular have a greater adverse outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest impact on LOS occurred among patients with severe CDI. The excess LOS for mild-to-moderate CDI was 0.75 days (95% CI: 0.59 - 0.89), and for severe CDI, it was 4.11 days (95% CI: 3.90 - 4.32) [23]. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients with CDI in particular have a greater adverse outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,24 We therefore performed two follow-up analyses to account for this. First, we stratified the LOS comparison by the time of CDI diagnosis for case definition (iv) into 0–3 day, 3–8 day, and ≥8 day case cohorts, training new propensity models for re-matching, with similar performance (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,24,36 Unlike visit diagnosis codes, toxin assay results provide a presumptive time-to-infection that we incorporated into two different statistical methods addressing time-dependent bias. When using a case definition of either toxin assay being positive, the measured difference in LOS in the multistate model corresponded closely with the difference seen in the “early HA” stratum of a time-stratified propensity-matched analysis (3.3 vs. 3.1 days).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations