1991
DOI: 10.1021/je00002a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excess viscosities of binary mixtures of chloroform and alcohols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is still more surprising if we consider that the viscosity of methanol–chloroform mixtures increases with respect to that of the pure solvents at high chloroform molar fractions. 58 Hypothesizing a similar behavior for the deuterated solvents, we interpolated a value of 5.7 × 10 –4 kg m –1 s –1 for the viscosity of the employed solvent mixture (taking as a reference the viscosity of deuterated chloroform reported in ref (59)). Employing the Stokes–Einstein equation for the translational diffusion coefficient, D = kT /(6πη r H ), the diameters of the diffusing particles can be estimated to be around 6.4 and 4.5 nm in chloroform and in methanol–chloroform mixture, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is still more surprising if we consider that the viscosity of methanol–chloroform mixtures increases with respect to that of the pure solvents at high chloroform molar fractions. 58 Hypothesizing a similar behavior for the deuterated solvents, we interpolated a value of 5.7 × 10 –4 kg m –1 s –1 for the viscosity of the employed solvent mixture (taking as a reference the viscosity of deuterated chloroform reported in ref (59)). Employing the Stokes–Einstein equation for the translational diffusion coefficient, D = kT /(6πη r H ), the diameters of the diffusing particles can be estimated to be around 6.4 and 4.5 nm in chloroform and in methanol–chloroform mixture, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that the majority of deviations are lower than ±0.1%, the average absolute deviation (AAD) is about 0.06% (see also Table 3). Most of the data by Zúñiga-Moreno and Galicia-Luna [53] show systematic negative deviations, although the deviations are very close [49]; ( ), [56]; ( ), [71]; (×), [58]; (⊗), [64]; ( ), [74]; (♦), [47]; (+), [65]; ( ), [73]; ( ), [61]; ( ), [70]; ( ), [62]; ( ), [33]; ( ), [72]; (♂), [76]; (♀), [32]; ( ), [75]; ( ), [35]; ( ), [36]; ( ), [21]; (--), calculated with correlation by Khasanshin [92]; (----), calculated with correlation by Marczak et al [47].…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Fukuchi [30] 0.10 Kabir [56] 0.65 Azim [5] 0. 22 Zhuravlev [32] 0.14 Valtz [58] 0.08 Kretschmer [6] 0.14 Kubota [33] 0.08 Zéberg-Mikkelsen [62] 0.10 Ling [7] 0.09 Crabtree [35] 0.21 Yang [64] 0.40 Zakar'yaev [27] 0.21 Garcia [36] 0.13 Watson [65] 0.13 Westmeier [16] 0.13 Marczak [47] 0.06 Huo [72] 0.06 Li [73] 0.10 Pang [74] 0.07 Vercher [76] 0.11 Coquelet [71] 0.11 Gil-Hernandez [61] 0.11 Khasanshin [92] 0.09 Bhuiyan [70] 0.12 Zúñiga-Moreno and Galicia-Luna [53] 0.12 Golubev [10,19] 0.22 Benson [22] 0.06 Sakurai [31] 0.09 Gold [11] 0.11 Papaionannou [40] 0.001 Rodriguez [48] 0.06 Djojoputro [60] 0.10 Aminabhavi [39] 0.07 Resa [75] 0.09 Ortega [34] 0.08 Chandrashekara [20] 0.04 Tashima [26] 0.10 Marigliano [50] 0.09 Kumagi et al [45] 0.11 González [66] 0.10 Peleteiro [52] 0.07 ison between the present measured densities and the reported data at high temperatures and high pressures is presented in Figs. 3-5 and in Table 4. Figs.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since some investigators do not adhere to this practice, dis-crepancies are to be expected. For the atmospheric-pressure measurements of the viscosity of the alcohols, an Ubbelohde type of viscometer was used by Rauf et al [13,1 (no calibrant liquid quoted), Crabtree and O'Brien [14] and Paez and Contreras [15] (both calibrated with water), and Phillips and Murphy [16] (calibrated with diethyl ether). Although they all quote uncertainties of about +0.2%, their values deviate from the present measurements up to -3, -1.6, -I.7, and +1.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Alcoholsmentioning
confidence: 99%