2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange inlet optimization by genetic algorithm for improved RBCC performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimization designs on the two-dimensional and three-dimensional inlets have generally been extensively studied by using the response surface method and the genetic algorithm to obtain a higher total pressure recovery and more uniform outflow at the inlet exit [19][20][21]. The issues affecting the performance of the inlet are considered comprehensively in the above optimization methods, but they are too complicated by consuming a lot of computational resources, making it difficult to reveal the general rules of shock wave configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization designs on the two-dimensional and three-dimensional inlets have generally been extensively studied by using the response surface method and the genetic algorithm to obtain a higher total pressure recovery and more uniform outflow at the inlet exit [19][20][21]. The issues affecting the performance of the inlet are considered comprehensively in the above optimization methods, but they are too complicated by consuming a lot of computational resources, making it difficult to reveal the general rules of shock wave configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive tuning of PID sliding surface parameters based on improved genetic algorithm (IGA). Genetic algorithm (GA) has the characteristics of a simple algorithm, parallel processing and global optimal solution (Tripp, 2010;Chen et al, 2013;Chorkawy and Etele, 2017). Both Mahdi (Mahdi, 2014) and Dastranj (Dastranj et al, 2011) used GA to set PID controller parameters and verified by experiment and simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By randomly altering the alleles of genes, the GAs can effectively avoid trap situations and maintain sufficient variance in the population [24,25], whereas the probability of mutation is around 1%, since a high probability of mutation reduces the GA to a random search function.…”
Section: Journal Of Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%