2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ey.1943-7897.0000446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation Current Analysis of a Hydropower Station Model Considering Complex Water Diversion Pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All welds of the switch pipe shall be 100% ultrasonic inspection, supplemented by 40% TOFD inspection and 100% magnetic particle inspection. Non-destructive testing should be carried out 48 hours after the welding is completed, and 100% colored penetration testing should be carried out after the hydraulic test [11].…”
Section: Welding Of Steel Bifurcationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All welds of the switch pipe shall be 100% ultrasonic inspection, supplemented by 40% TOFD inspection and 100% magnetic particle inspection. Non-destructive testing should be carried out 48 hours after the welding is completed, and 100% colored penetration testing should be carried out after the hydraulic test [11].…”
Section: Welding Of Steel Bifurcationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To clearly demonstrate the relationship between turbine speed and load, first order differential equation is adopted to model the generator and it follows [32]:…”
Section: Generator Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lundström et al [21] analyzed the influence of the rotor and stator shape deviation on the dynamic characteristics of the generator, and proved the importance of the unbalanced magnetic pull nonlinear influence; Calleecharan et al [22] proposed a rotor model considering radial and tangential unbalanced magnetic pull forces; Xu et al [23] studied the effect of UMP on radial vibration of hydroelectric generators, and compared and analyzed the simulation results and the field experimental data; Zeng et al [24] established the hydro turbine generating sets dynamics model by using the unbalanced magnetic pull force acting on the generator and the unbalanced force acting on the rotor as the input excitation of the hydro turbine generating sets system; Xu et al [25] established a hydro-generator dynamics model considering the nonlinear unbalanced magnetic pull force and the linear water unbalance force; Xu et al [26] studied the response characteristics of unbalanced magnetic pull rotor system considering both static and dynamic eccentricity. Xiang et al [27] analyzed the influence of unbalanced magnetic pull on the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of permanent magnet synchronous motors rotor system; Li et al [28] established a two-dimensional hydroelectric generator electromagnetic model, using the finite element method to study the characteristics of the electromagnetic flux and electromagnetic force; Yan et al [29] analyzed the influence of excitation current on the nonlinear dynamic behaviors of the generator. It should be noted that in all of the above research, most of them only consider one nonlinearity factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%