1970
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(70)80628-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation functions for the bombardment of 56Fe with protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The excitation functions for 56 Fe(p, n) 56 Co are shown in figure 3. Except for data by Levkovskij [32] and Jenkins et al [34], the experimental data agree well with the result of TALYS-1.4 calculations. The excitation function of 57 Fe(p, n) 57 Co shown in figure 4 and that of 58 Fe(p, n) 58 Co Table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The excitation functions for 56 Fe(p, n) 56 Co are shown in figure 3. Except for data by Levkovskij [32] and Jenkins et al [34], the experimental data agree well with the result of TALYS-1.4 calculations. The excitation function of 57 Fe(p, n) 57 Co shown in figure 4 and that of 58 Fe(p, n) 58 Co Table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The calculated results for 56 Fe(p, n) 56 Co, 57 Fe(p, n) 57 Co and 58 Fe(p, n) 58 Co reaction cross-sections are in good agreement with experimental data [7,8,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] taken from EXFOR as shown in figures 3-5. The computed cross-section together with the experimental data are plotted.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The calculated results for 56 Fe(p, n) 56 Co reaction crosssections are in good agreement with experimental data [62][63][64][65][66][67] taken from EXFOR as shown in Fig. 11.…”
Section: Theoretical Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 84%
“…12) are in good agreement with experimental data taken from [62]. The experimental data for 56 Fe(p, np) 55 Co reaction cross-section were given in [64,69,70], and there is a discrepancy in both of them. The present theoretical results are in agreement with experimental data taken from [69] as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Theoretical Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation