2012
DOI: 10.1021/ct2009363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation Gaps of Finite-Sized Systems from Optimally Tuned Range-Separated Hybrid Functionals

Abstract: Excitation gaps are of considerable significance in electronic structure theory. Two different gaps are of particular interest. The fundamental gap is defined by charged excitations, as the difference between the first ionization potential and the first electron affinity. The optical gap is defined by a neutral excitation, as the difference between the energies of the lowest dipole-allowed excited state and the ground state. Within many-body perturbation theory, the fundamental gap is the difference between th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
1,080
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 881 publications
(1,108 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
24
1,080
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar form for the tuning norm has also been proposed, 35,38 differing from eq. 16 only in the cross-terms of its square, which we write as…”
Section: Choice Of Tuning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar form for the tuning norm has also been proposed, 35,38 differing from eq. 16 only in the cross-terms of its square, which we write as…”
Section: Choice Of Tuning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no guarantee that the amount of HF-like exchange (HFLE) required to achieve a good match to the true band gap is the same for all systems, but at least for simple binary semiconductors this seems to be the case [85,86]. In this context, we feel it is also opportune to mention the optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functional method of Kronik and co-workers [87,88]. In their approach, the range-separation parameter of a range-separated XC functional is tuned, such that for a given system, the KS gap found with this XC functional is equal to the difference between the IP and EA potentials obtained in Δ-SCF calculations using the same XC functional.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Driving Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of ” can be fixed or it can be 'tuned' on a system-by-system basis by minimising some tuning norm. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Whether the parameter is fixed or tuned, it is well established that such functionals yield improvements in many long-range properties, most notably charge-transfer excitation energies, and they have become the functional of choice in many studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%