2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)02543-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitatory effects of dopamine on subthalamic nucleus neurons: in vitro study of rats pretreated with 6-hydroxydopamine and levodopa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Haloperidol-treated mice (2.0 mg/kg) showed highly significant decrease (10.94 ± 2.16 ng/ml) in dopamine level as compared to saline-treated mice (p < 0.05). Dopamine exerted a direct excitatory influence on subthalamic nucleus (STN) neurons via activation of D2-like receptors; the excitatory effect of dopamine was reduced by D2 antagonist haloperidol [34]. Small decrease in dopamine content was found in mice co-treated with BRC solution administered either orally or i.n., having concentrations of 14.00 ± 0.37 and 15.71 ± 1.42 ng/ml, respectively, which showed nonsignificant result among each other (p > 0.05) but relatively significant result as compared to saline (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Dopamine Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haloperidol-treated mice (2.0 mg/kg) showed highly significant decrease (10.94 ± 2.16 ng/ml) in dopamine level as compared to saline-treated mice (p < 0.05). Dopamine exerted a direct excitatory influence on subthalamic nucleus (STN) neurons via activation of D2-like receptors; the excitatory effect of dopamine was reduced by D2 antagonist haloperidol [34]. Small decrease in dopamine content was found in mice co-treated with BRC solution administered either orally or i.n., having concentrations of 14.00 ± 0.37 and 15.71 ± 1.42 ng/ml, respectively, which showed nonsignificant result among each other (p > 0.05) but relatively significant result as compared to saline (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Dopamine Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it has been speculated that pattern abnormalities in STN may result from loss of dopamine in the STN (Meibach and Katzman, 1979;Campbell et al, 1985;Besson et al, 1988;Johnson et al, 1994;Kreiss et al, 1997;Francois et al, 2000;Smith and Kieval, 2000;Zhu et al, 2002) or from changes in the synchronization between STN neurons and cortex (Magill et al, 2000a(Magill et al, ,b, 2001Wichmann et al, 2001b). Other explanations would include altered interactions between STN and brainstem areas such as the pedunculopontine nucleus (Orieux et al, 2000) or between STN and the intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus (Bacci et al, 2002).…”
Section: Gpe Activity Changes and The Development Of Parkinsonian Motmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these mechanisms do not appear sufficient to generate slow oscillatory activity in the STN-GP network in brain slices that preserve connectivity between GP and STN (Loucif et al, 2005). Nevertheless, these observations provide evidence that GP and STN networks have intrinsic mechanisms for supporting oscillatory activity in slow frequency ranges and led Plenz and Kitai (1999) to propose that activity in the indirect pathway supports changes in firing patterns observed after dopamine loss in vivo.In vitro studies have made considerable progress in characterizing the neurophysiological properties of the STN neurons and exploring how different patterns of inhibitory and excitatory input might affect STN activity (Mintz et al, 1986;Nakanishi et al, 1987;Beurrier et al, 1999;Bevan and Wilson, 1999;Bevan et al, 2000Bevan et al, , 2002aWigmore and Lacey, 2000;Zhu et al, 2002;Do and Bean, 2003;Hallworth et al, 2003; Wilson et al, 2004a,b;Baufreton et al, 2005;Surmeier et al, 2005;Kass and Mintz, 2006). With respect to the interplay of excitatory and inhibitory input, GABAergic inhibition can increase the efficiency of STN response to excitatory input by promoting recovery of inactivated voltage-dependent Na+ (Na v ) channels (Baufreton et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%