1987
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/13/10/018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excited 0+states and E0 transitions in200Hg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the assignment is based on the observed E0 transition to the 0 + ground state [22], our measured ratio R(5/17.5) = 0.58 (16) does not allow a 0 + assignment since this state does not show the typical forward-peaking expected for a L = 0 transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although the assignment is based on the observed E0 transition to the 0 + ground state [22], our measured ratio R(5/17.5) = 0.58 (16) does not allow a 0 + assignment since this state does not show the typical forward-peaking expected for a L = 0 transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The necessary parameters are derived from the values p(E0) = 0.021(3) obtained by Subber et a1 [14] for the 22-2, transition in 2ooHg and from the isomer shift results [31]. We obtain By= -0.020 fm2 and Pn= 0.034 fm2.…”
Section: Eo Transitions and X Valuesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Calibration data were taken from Lederer and Shirley [20] and Debertin [21] and a Gaussian fitting routine was used to obtain energies and intensities. These intensity measurements have a greater precision than the data used by Subber et aZ [14] in their evaluation of internal conversion coefficients from measurements of electron intensities, and in several cases a re-evaluation has been made.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations