2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.74.155411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exciton absorption of perpendicularly polarized light in carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
106
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2b). This shows that the observed peaks can be ascribed to three excitonic transitions E ii between sub-bands of same index i (refs 26,[26][27][28][29][30]33).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2b). This shows that the observed peaks can be ascribed to three excitonic transitions E ii between sub-bands of same index i (refs 26,[26][27][28][29][30]33).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these optical resonances is referred to as S ij or M ij , depending on the nature of the nanotube (S for semiconducting and M for metallic) and the corresponding valence (i) and conduction (j) sub-band in the single-particle band model. Selection rules in SWNTs requires that incident light polarized parallel to the tube main axis probes transitions between sub-bands of the same index (i ¼ j), and that cross-polarized light addresses transitions between sub-bands with unitary index difference (|i À j| ¼ 1) 29,30 . More precisely, each sub-band i shows Rydberg-like exciton states, which are composed of 4 singlet and 12 triplet states 30 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the depolarization effect, these perpendicular transitions are expected to be heavily suppressed, 41 although excitonic effects are predicted to retain this transition as a well-defined peak in absorption at a renormalized energy. 49 Subsequently, Jiang et al, 50 using the tight-binding method, calculated the electric dipole matrix elements (whose square is proportional to optical absorption), yielding analytical expressions as a function of chiral index and wavevector, k. As Ajiki and Ando, they found that parallel interband transitions are allowed only between massive bands of the same index and k-vector and not at all allowed between massless linear bands, for armchair species. Furthermore, by examining the kdependence of the matrix element, they found that the dipole matrix element reaches a maximum for k-values that coincide with the positions of the van Hove singularities (VHS) in the electronic density-of-states for each band.…”
Section: B Selection Rules For Optical Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exciton specified by a center-of-mass wave vector in the axis direction k c and u = (ζ,ξ,j ) where ζ and ξ denote the valleys for the electron and hole, respectively, and j is the index for the other degrees of freedom, is written by a superposition of electron-hole pair states as 2,12 …”
Section: Excitonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The optical response of the nanotubes is anisotropic where light polarized in parallel to the nanotube axis strongly excites excitons as compared to perpendicular polarization. 4,6,[12][13][14] For the excitons excited for the parallel polarization, electrons and holes are well associated with specific symmetric conduction and valence subbands with respect to the Fermi energy. Such excitons consisting of electrons and holes in the ith-lowest conduction and the ith-highest valence subbands, respectively, are denoted as E ii excitons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%