2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exciton binding energy in GaAsBiN spherical quantum dot heterostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavior of the binding energies without pressure (P ¼ 0 kbar) is similar to the previous results found in refs. [38,39,49,50]. For all pressures, we observe that the binding energy increases from its bulk value in GaAs as the dot radius is reduced, reaches a maximum value, and then drops to the bulk value characteristic of the barrier material as the dot radius goes to zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The behavior of the binding energies without pressure (P ¼ 0 kbar) is similar to the previous results found in refs. [38,39,49,50]. For all pressures, we observe that the binding energy increases from its bulk value in GaAs as the dot radius is reduced, reaches a maximum value, and then drops to the bulk value characteristic of the barrier material as the dot radius goes to zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The total ground state energy E ex of the exciton in terms of the variational parameter and the dot radius is calculated as an eigenvalue problem by using appropriate expressions for the ground state wave functions in the interior and exterior region of the dot and evaluating the normalization constants and variational parameters using a technique used in refs. . Schrödinger equations for the electron are solved for r e/h > R (dot radius) resulting in a transcendental equation of the form: Kcottrue(KRtrue)=κ whereK=2me/h*Ee/handκ=2mnormale*true(Ve/hEe/htrue) …”
Section: Theoretical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This diversity concerns both the geometric shape of the structure and the profile of the associated confinement potential. There have been several reports on excitonic phenomena in 0D nanostructures where they are described as rectangular quantum boxes (QB) with a finite or infinite confinement barrier [1][2][3], spherical quantum dots with a rectangular potential barrier [4,5], parabolic [6][7][8] and gradual potential profile [9]. We found also a description of 0D nanostructures as cylindrical [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], conical [17], triangular [18], and lens-shaped quantum dots [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%