2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.92.077402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitonic Effects and Optical Spectra of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Abstract: Many-electron effects often dramatically modify the properties of reduced dimensional systems. We report calculations, based on an ab initio many-electron Green's function approach, of electronhole interaction effects on the optical spectra of small-diameter single-walled carbon nanotubes. Excitonic effects qualitatively alter the optical spectra of both semiconducting and metallic tubes. Excitons are bound by ∼ 1 eV in the semiconducting (8,0) tube and by ∼ 100 meV in the metallic (3,3) tube. These large many… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

65
957
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 936 publications
(1,029 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
65
957
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to strong 1D confinement in SWNTs, the electrostatic electron-hole interaction energy (i.e., exciton binding energy) is very large, on the order of 300-500 meV, relative to an energy gap of ~1 eV. [111][112][113][114] As a result of this strong eh attraction, it is generally accepted that the photoexcited state of an SWNT is excitonic. In SWNTs, the electron orbits the heavier hole at a characteristic eh separation (Bohr radius) of approximately 2.5 nm.…”
Section: Free-electron Vs Exciton Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to strong 1D confinement in SWNTs, the electrostatic electron-hole interaction energy (i.e., exciton binding energy) is very large, on the order of 300-500 meV, relative to an energy gap of ~1 eV. [111][112][113][114] As a result of this strong eh attraction, it is generally accepted that the photoexcited state of an SWNT is excitonic. In SWNTs, the electron orbits the heavier hole at a characteristic eh separation (Bohr radius) of approximately 2.5 nm.…”
Section: Free-electron Vs Exciton Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SWNTs, the electron orbits the heavier hole at a characteristic eh separation (Bohr radius) of approximately 2.5 nm. 111,113,115 The exciton is a mobile quasiparticle that travels along the SWNT with an average diffusion length of ~90 nm before relaxing to the ground state. 116 Both the HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) and LUMO (lowest …”
Section: Free-electron Vs Exciton Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). After annealing at 600 • C for 120 s in N2 (ramp 5 • /s) a broad adsorption band around 1650 nm appears, associated with the first dipole active exciton (E11) [29,30,31]. The broad shape of the absorption peak is due to the presence of a distribution of nanotubes in the sample, with diameters ranging from 0.8 to 1.2 nm [32].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large Stark shifts were observed in fields directed perpendicular to the 2D planes. In 1D carbon nanotubes, excitons were predicted to have large binding energies [6] and to dominate the absorption spectra [7,8], a fact which was verified experimentally by two-photon spectroscopy [9,10] and from the observation of the phonon sidebands in photoconductivity spectra [11]. The exciton binding energies in carbon nanotubes have interesting scaling properties [8] and they can be as small as those in 2D structures and as large as 30% of their bandgap depending on both the nanotube structure and the environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%