2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus eliminate consummatory but not instrumental successive negative contrast in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar dissociations between these two procedures have been observed with lesions of the hippocampus , nucleus accumbens (Leszczuk and Flaherty, 2000), and gustatory thalamus (Sastre and Reilly, 2006). Whereas hippocampal and accumbens lesions disrupted iSNC and had no detectable effects for cSNC, the opposite was the case for gustatory thalamus lesions.…”
Section: Acc and Psychological Painmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Similar dissociations between these two procedures have been observed with lesions of the hippocampus , nucleus accumbens (Leszczuk and Flaherty, 2000), and gustatory thalamus (Sastre and Reilly, 2006). Whereas hippocampal and accumbens lesions disrupted iSNC and had no detectable effects for cSNC, the opposite was the case for gustatory thalamus lesions.…”
Section: Acc and Psychological Painmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This is perhaps not surprising, since both cafeteria groups demonstrated low levels of operant pellet self-administration during the training and extinction phases. These effects may be explained by the successive negative contrast effect, which describes a change in animals' behavior following a downshift in the qualitative or quantitative value of an expected reward [39] and is often observed in the context of instrumental settings when food pellets are used as reward [40], [41]. Indeed, since rats compare the present reward with their previous experiences and respond according to its relative value [42], rats that previously had access to highly palatable cafeteria items may not perceive the operant pellet to be as rewarding as the rats fed chow-only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the introduction, a variety of results suggest that the consummatory behavior of mammals may be more sensitive to incentive shifts than their instrumental behavior (e.g., [12]). Moreover, lesion experiments show that iSNC and cSNC are dissociable [30][32]. Accordingly, additional dependent variables were registered in an attempt to detect evidence for incentive encoding in toads, but none of them provided clear results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%