2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6451.00198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exclusive Contracts And Market Power: Evidence From Ocean Shipping

Abstract: There is a substantial theoretical literature on the potential effects of loyalty contracts, but relatively little empirical work. We employ the event study methodology to examine the competitive effects of exclusionary contracts in the ocean shipping industry, where they were the subject of an extended legal and political struggle. We find that some of the most important events in this conflict caused significant changes in shipping firms' stock returns, indicating exclusive contracts increased their profits.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might prompt more antitrust attention in industries with larger opportunity or fixed costs, smaller technological advantages of the potential rival, larger scale efficiencies, or other cases that would result in a smaller fraction of signed buyers needed to deter entry. The limited empirical evidence matches this result as ocean shipping firms, who presumably have large fixed entry costs, were found to be using exclusive dealing primarily to gain market power (Marin and Sicotte, 2003). The data also show that non-binding buyer communication decreases exclusion rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might prompt more antitrust attention in industries with larger opportunity or fixed costs, smaller technological advantages of the potential rival, larger scale efficiencies, or other cases that would result in a smaller fraction of signed buyers needed to deter entry. The limited empirical evidence matches this result as ocean shipping firms, who presumably have large fixed entry costs, were found to be using exclusive dealing primarily to gain market power (Marin and Sicotte, 2003). The data also show that non-binding buyer communication decreases exclusion rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…6 Results concerning the effects of exclusive contracts also vary across examined industries. For example, studies of the beer industry (Sass, 2005;Asker, 2004) and industrial machinery and electric equipment industry (Heide et al, 1998) uncovered positive welfare effects while an investigation of the ocean shipping industry (Marin and Sicotte, 2003) concluded that exclusive contracts helped carriers increase and maintain market power. While these empirical studies are undoubtedly valuable, it might be difficult to generalize results due to industryspecific details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Alexandrou et al (2014) on a more extended research conclude on the positive impact of mergers and acquisitions. In a different perspective, Marín and Sicotte (2003) has shown that some oligopolistic practices that have been apparent in the shipping industry in the 50's and the 60's were having a positive effect on the stocks of the companies.…”
Section: Review Of the Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons that a factory is willing to authorize an exporter to develop the overseas markets are as follows: (a) The factory is usually short of overseas business experience and manpower; it can use the exporter's experience to fast enter overseas markets (Daniels, 2016); (b) The factory wants to save its developing cost and use the existing channels to quickly develop the overseas markets; (c) The factory can make more profits through mass production (Marín & Sicotte, 2003).…”
Section: To Add a Protection Clause To The Sales Contractmentioning
confidence: 99%