1950
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1950.sp000954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excretion of Histamine in Human Urine

Abstract: 1. A simplification of the method of Anrep et al. for the estimation of histamine in human urine is described. 2. It is not possible by this method to obtain a reliable estimation of the amount of free histamine normally present in human urine, but the effects of the administration of histamine may be followed. 3. When 133 mg. of histamine was given by mouth to three men, it was mainly conjugated histamine that appeared in the urine. 4. When 3·5‐5 mg. was infused intravenously in three men, free histamine appe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1952
1952
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding of an increase in blood histamine accompanied by a normal value for excretion of -histamine in the urine of these patients suggests that the high blood levels were not due to liberation of histamine into the plasma, since in such circumstances increased urinary excretion would be expected (21). It is possible, of course, that histamine was retained in the plasma because the kidneys failed to excrete it, but it appears more likely that the high values were due to a disturbance of hepatic function resulting in an increase in histamine in other elements of the blood, possibly in the eosinophilic or basophilic leukocytes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The finding of an increase in blood histamine accompanied by a normal value for excretion of -histamine in the urine of these patients suggests that the high blood levels were not due to liberation of histamine into the plasma, since in such circumstances increased urinary excretion would be expected (21). It is possible, of course, that histamine was retained in the plasma because the kidneys failed to excrete it, but it appears more likely that the high values were due to a disturbance of hepatic function resulting in an increase in histamine in other elements of the blood, possibly in the eosinophilic or basophilic leukocytes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It should be mentioned here that very large doses of histamine (133 mg) have been given orally to man without any significant increase in urinary free histamine (ADAM, 1949). This should mean that less than 2 mg histamine reached the circulating blood (ADAM, CARD, RIDDELL, ROBERTS and STRONG, 1954) and indicates that histamine in the intestine is fairly efficiently metabolized before it is absorbed by the blood, if it is absorbed.…”
Section: Histamine Formation In Manmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Both methods involve a concentration of the histamine by absorption to a cation exchanger and subsequent biological assay of the histamine content of the eluate on the isolated ileum of the guinea-pig. ADAM (1949) initially used a modification of the method described by ANREP et al (1944), in which histamine was concentrated by adsorption to charcoal. Then ROBERTS and ADAM (1950) succeeded in developing a more sensitive and reliable method for urinary histamine, namely:…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter has been identified as acetyl histamine (Millican, Rosenthal & Tabor, 1949). The injection of histamine increases the quantity of free histamine in the urine, and its oral administration increases the urinary excretion of acetyl histamine (Anrep et al 1944; Adam, 1950). Histamine is also partly destroyed in the body, and appears in the urine as imidazoleacetic acid (Tabor, Mehler & Schayer, 1953).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%