Executive Compensation, Sustainability, Climate, Environmental Concerns, and Company Financial Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Commercial Banks

Abstract

This research investigates whether executive compensation is designed to motivate managers to pursue corporate sustainability (CS) concerns as measured by Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) 3.1 disclosure indicators in Indonesian listed commercial banks throughout 2007–2014. In addition, this study examines the impact of executive compensation, climate, and environmental concerns on both financial health and market value performance as components of company financial performance (CFP). This study, based on an agency theoretic and stakeholder positions, focuses on banking entities in a developing country, and enriches the literature by examining topics through the application of the Throughput Model that captures different pathways and stages. The results suggest that higher executive compensation in Indonesian banking entities may motivate management to do more for climate and environmental concerns, as well as to enhance CFP. Contrary to expectations, climate and environmental concerns have a significant negative impact on both financial health and market value performance. This implies that Indonesian banking companies may tend to conduct corporate responsibility activities only for their own-sake as an altruism motive, which influences the reduction of firms’ financial performance. This study comes to the conclusion that CS concern depicts a weakening factor as well as a partial mediator in the relationship between executive compensation and financial health performance.

The Effect of Declarations of Sustainability Reports on Financial Performances of Banks in Turkey

“…When we add the sizes of banks to our model, the environment and human resources have still a significant and negative effect on ROA. These results show a parallelism with the study of Kartadjumena and Rodgers (2019) in which the effect of sustainability performance on banks' financial performance was analyzed in India. This also shows that the workouts of banks on environment and human resources are just a cost object for most of the shareholders.…”

“…According to the table, we see that Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models and statistical comparison methods were used to compare banks, on the other hand; panel data analysis was used to find out the effect of relations between sustainability and banks. When we check the studies in which panel data analysis was used to find out relations between sustainability performance and financial performance, we see that Buallay [6] found a positive relationship in general, Matuszak & Rózanska [21] couldn't find a relationship in general and Kartadjumena & Rodgers [16] found a negative relationship in general. As you see, these studies couldn't find a common relationship between sustainability performance and financial performance in the banking sector.…”

“…The performance values were calculated for these groups by using a scoring model. This scoring model were explained below [16] (p. 9), [21] (p. 9); About these 4 groups; …”

Business Sustainability Performance Evaluation for Taiwanese Banks—A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

“…A safe and sound banking system aids a nation in its economic development by channeling money from fund providers to users [33,34]. Kartadjumena and Rodgers [35] found that when corporate executives become more conscious of sustainability, they strive to improve company financial performance (CFP). For this reason, FSC, the regulatory authority for financial institutions, supervise banks so that banks adhere to their fundamental values of helping individuals and businesses to access the needed funds in fulfillment of their personal and business goals, thus stimulating the wealth and prosperity of the community as a whole [5].…”

Female Executives in the Service Sector: The Case of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Spain

“…Therefore, it is expected that the decisions of the organization are consistent with gender diversity trends. As Kartadjumena and Rodgers [106] argue, companies can improve their management decisions when the interests of different stakeholders are taken into account, in addition to shareholders.…”