2016
DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2015.1135421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive functions and processing speed in children with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities and externalizing behavior problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The first assumption: cognitive family-based rehabilitation (sustained attention, working memory, and inhibition) has effects on the executive functions of male children between 10 and 14 years old. Given the multi-variable covariance, it seems that there is a significant difference between the two groups that is consistent with some studies (5)(6)(7)(8), but it is non-consistent with previous studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first assumption: cognitive family-based rehabilitation (sustained attention, working memory, and inhibition) has effects on the executive functions of male children between 10 and 14 years old. Given the multi-variable covariance, it seems that there is a significant difference between the two groups that is consistent with some studies (5)(6)(7)(8), but it is non-consistent with previous studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Children with ID have difficulty in controlling their impulses, organizing, prioritizing, and coordinating the information they receive because of weakness in underlying mechanisms [14]. Previous studies evaluated the effects of inhibition training in ID and reported that such intervention has significant effects [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of the imbalance model, increased susceptibility to peer influence in adolescents with MBID could be explained by a larger imbalance between social-emotional and cognitive control systems. Although this claim has not been investigated at a neurobiological level, there is ample evidence that adolescents with MBID have inhibition deficits as compared to typically developing adolescents (see Bexkens et al 2014 for a meta-analysis; Schuiringa et al 2017), and inhibition is an important component of cognitive control (Ridderinkhof et al 2004). These inhibitory deficits may suggest a larger imbalance between the social-emotional and the cognitive control system in adolescents with MBID, which may increase their susceptibility to peer influence (Albert et al 2013).…”
Section: Susceptibility To Peer Influence In Adolescents With Mbidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D'autre part, les personnes présentant une DI peuvent manifester des multiples déficits au niveau des fonctions exécutives qui entraveraient leurs capacités de régulation émotionnelle (Nader-Grosbois, 2012), plus particulièrement d'autorégulation. Ces difficultés sont souvent présentes chez les personnes manifestant des TC, en particulier les fonctions exécutives de base telles que la mémoire de travail, l'inhibition et la flexibilité cognitive (Schuiringa, van Nieuwenhuijzen, Orobio de Castro et Matthys, 2016;Sinclair, Blencowe, McCaig et Misch, 2013) qui sont des composantes essentielles à l'autorégulation (Barkley, 2012). De plus, les personnes présentant une DI auraient également moins de contrôle sur leur vie quotidienne, ce qui augmenterait chez elles l'impact du stress (Scott et Havercamp, 2014).…”
Section: La Crise Comportementale Comme Processus Transactionnel Et Iunclassified