1994
DOI: 10.1080/87565649409540564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive functions in school‐aged children: Potential efficacy of tasks in discriminating clinical groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
63
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Behavioral inhibition has been operationalized using a variety of measures, including the Continuous Performance Task (CPT) (see, for reviews, Barkley et al, 1992;Corkum & Siegel, 1993;Losier et al, 1996), delay of gratification tasks (DGTs) (Campbell, Douglas, & Morgernstern, 1971;Pennington & Ozonoff, 1996;Weyandt & Grant, 1994), and the Stroop Test (see for review, Homack & Riccio, 2004). Consistent with this literature, in the current study, behavioral inhibition is measured using CPT commission errors, DGT waiting time, and Stroop interference effects.…”
Section: Studies Of Inhibition and Adhd Symptoms In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Behavioral inhibition has been operationalized using a variety of measures, including the Continuous Performance Task (CPT) (see, for reviews, Barkley et al, 1992;Corkum & Siegel, 1993;Losier et al, 1996), delay of gratification tasks (DGTs) (Campbell, Douglas, & Morgernstern, 1971;Pennington & Ozonoff, 1996;Weyandt & Grant, 1994), and the Stroop Test (see for review, Homack & Riccio, 2004). Consistent with this literature, in the current study, behavioral inhibition is measured using CPT commission errors, DGT waiting time, and Stroop interference effects.…”
Section: Studies Of Inhibition and Adhd Symptoms In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These measures include the Matching Familiar Figures Test (Campbell, Douglas, & Morgenstern, 1971 ;DuPaul, Anastopoulos, Shelton, Guevremont, & Metevia, 1992 ;Weyandt & Grant, 1994), the Continuous Performance Task (see for reviews, Barkley, Grodzinsky, & DuPaul, 1992 ;Corkum & Siegel, 1993 ; see also Halperin et al, 1994), the Go\No-go Task (Iaboni, Douglas, & Baker, 1995 ;Milich et al, 1994 ;Shue & Douglas, 1992), delayed response tasks (Daugherty & Quay, 1991 ;McClure & Gordon, 1984 ;Schweitzer & Sulzer-Azaroff, 1995 ;Solanto, 1990), the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (see for review, Barkley et al, 1992), and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Executive functions (EFs) are mental control processes that enable self-control necessary for the attainment of a future goal (Denckla, 1996;Lezak, 1995;Pennington & Ozonoff, 1996;Welsh & Pennington, 1988). EF refers to cognitive functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex (Becker, Isaac, & Hynd, 1987;Cabeza & Nyberg, 2000;Fuster, 1997;Reitan & Wolfson, 1994;Rezai et al, 1993;Tranel, Anderson, & Benton, 1994), such as inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility or set-shifting, planning, and verbal fluency (Ozonoff, 1997;Pennington & Ozonoff, 1996;Reader, Harris, Schuerholz, & Denckla, 1994;Weynandt & Willis, 1994). Multiple studies have identified EF deficits in preschoolers, children, adolescents as well as adults with autism (Geurts, Verte´, Oosterlaan, Roeyers, & Sergeant, 2004;Hill, 2004;Ozonoff, 1997;Pascualvaca, Fantie, Papageorgiou, & Mirsky, 1998;Russell, 1997;Shu, Lung, Tien, & Chen, 2001;Turner, 1999a; but see Griffith, Pennington, Wehner, & Rogers, 1999;Ozonoff & Strayer, 1997;Russell, Jarrold, & Hood, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%