2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01106-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exercise-Induced Changes in Muscle Size do not Contribute to Exercise-Induced Changes in Muscle Strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when examining correlations between exerciseinduced changes in muscle size and strength, these analyses are completed on groups designed to increase both muscle size and strength and also appear to be primarily correlating the error/random biological variability with muscle size with the error/random biological variability in muscle strength (Dankel et al, 2018). In other words, there is still no available evidence supporting the claim that changes in muscle size lead to changes in strength (Loenneke et al, 2019), and this aspect needs to be examined. Usui et al (2016) used an 8-week 50% 1RM squat training protocol at slow speed (3 s for concentric/eccentric actions) and found training-induced increase in strength of the HE but not of the KE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when examining correlations between exerciseinduced changes in muscle size and strength, these analyses are completed on groups designed to increase both muscle size and strength and also appear to be primarily correlating the error/random biological variability with muscle size with the error/random biological variability in muscle strength (Dankel et al, 2018). In other words, there is still no available evidence supporting the claim that changes in muscle size lead to changes in strength (Loenneke et al, 2019), and this aspect needs to be examined. Usui et al (2016) used an 8-week 50% 1RM squat training protocol at slow speed (3 s for concentric/eccentric actions) and found training-induced increase in strength of the HE but not of the KE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total body and abdominal measurements are the basis of body composition assessments, which, often combined with nutritional aspects, are integrated into clinical routine and have been used for the diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression in oncology, diabetes, obesity, sarcopenia, and cardiovascular [186][187][188][189]. However, there is a disassociation between muscle strength or power and lean mass or muscle size with respect to exercise intervention and age-dependent changes, because the contractile muscle capacity is strongly influenced by the EMCL and IMCL distribution [190][191][192][193][194]. In consequence, a quantitative assessment of the muscle composition has been suggested [195].…”
Section: Voismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We appreciate the opportunity to respond to Loenneke et al [44] and for these authors' willingness to exchange points on this matter. As we noted in our initial writing, evidence supports the contention that hypertrophy is neither a necessary nor sufficient cause of improved strength in all contexts.…”
Section: Reply To Loenneke Et Almentioning
confidence: 98%