2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exhalation of 222Rn from phosphogypsum piles located at the Southwest of Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is well above the recommended worldwide exposure limit of ≈2.4 mSv/year (UNSCEAR Report, 2000), and may thus pose a health threat to workers on the site or people living nearby (EURATOM Council Directive, 1996). In the same region, Dueñas et al, 2007, …”
Section: Atmospheric Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value is well above the recommended worldwide exposure limit of ≈2.4 mSv/year (UNSCEAR Report, 2000), and may thus pose a health threat to workers on the site or people living nearby (EURATOM Council Directive, 1996). In the same region, Dueñas et al, 2007, …”
Section: Atmospheric Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The most important source of PG radioactivity is reported to be 226 Ra (Rutherford et al, 1994). The data presented in Table 3 shows that a wide variation of 226 Ra activity concentrations has been observed (from 15 to 1140 Bq/kg for Sweden and Florida-USA, respectively), which can be attributed to the nature of the phosphate rock, the depth of sampling, and some 226 Ra migration (Dueñas et al, 2007 …”
Section: Characterisation Of Phosphogypsummentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although studies have shown that the radiological impact to the public due to the stacks is not significant (Cancio et al, 1998), they remain a source of social concern and receive sustained media coverage. The success of ongoing remediation works e radon exhalation from restored zones is eight times lower than active PG stacks (Dueñas et al, 2007) and gamma dose rates are reduced to almost background levels (Mas et al, 2006) e has failed to change public perception of risk. However, the operating license for the stacks (shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Huelva Estuarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in situ measurements are also performed, and they are more interesting in terms of looking for relationships between radon exhalation rate and different parameters. Some authors described this kind of measurements but the presented results regarded only a single or short-term measurements of radon exhalation rate from soil [10][11][12][13][14]. The study of the relationship between radon exhalation rate from soil and meteorological conditions has been carried out by Mazur and Kozak [15] and Ferry et al [16] The authors used an automatic device for long-term measurements of radon exhalation rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%