Geodynamics of a Cordilleran Orogenic System: The Central Andes of Argentina and Northern Chile 2015
DOI: 10.1130/2015.1212(10)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exhumation of the Precordillera and northern Sierras Pampeanas and along-strike correlation of the Andean orogenic front, northwestern Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding the early phase of retroarc foreland basin deformation is critical to better assess temporal estimates of shortening and the magnitude of underthrusting that may drive cycles in Cordilleran magmatism [ DeCelles et al ., , ], subduction slab inclination, and spatial shifts in major orogen‐scale topographic divides. Much emphasis has been placed on the late Miocene uplift history of the central Andes [ England and Molnar , ; Hoke and Garzione , ], while recent work in the central Andes has suggested a Paleocene onset of continuous foreland basin system development [ Carrapa et al ., , ], eastward progression of surface uplift [ Quade et al ., ], and basin partitioning by Sierras Pampeanas intraforeland uplifts [ Carrapa et al ., ; Ciccioli et al ., ; Carrapa and DeCelles , ; Safipour et al ., ]. Although Paleogene foreland sedimentation is well documented in NW Argentina between 24 and 28°S [ DeCelles et al ., ; Carrapa et al ., ], the early Cenozoic basin history between 28 and 34°S remains largely unconstrained and poorly documented, preventing a full understanding of what controls subduction margin segmentation, foreland basin connectivity, topographic evolution, and underlying geodynamic and surface processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the early phase of retroarc foreland basin deformation is critical to better assess temporal estimates of shortening and the magnitude of underthrusting that may drive cycles in Cordilleran magmatism [ DeCelles et al ., , ], subduction slab inclination, and spatial shifts in major orogen‐scale topographic divides. Much emphasis has been placed on the late Miocene uplift history of the central Andes [ England and Molnar , ; Hoke and Garzione , ], while recent work in the central Andes has suggested a Paleocene onset of continuous foreland basin system development [ Carrapa et al ., , ], eastward progression of surface uplift [ Quade et al ., ], and basin partitioning by Sierras Pampeanas intraforeland uplifts [ Carrapa et al ., ; Ciccioli et al ., ; Carrapa and DeCelles , ; Safipour et al ., ]. Although Paleogene foreland sedimentation is well documented in NW Argentina between 24 and 28°S [ DeCelles et al ., ; Carrapa et al ., ], the early Cenozoic basin history between 28 and 34°S remains largely unconstrained and poorly documented, preventing a full understanding of what controls subduction margin segmentation, foreland basin connectivity, topographic evolution, and underlying geodynamic and surface processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the east, the Fiambalá Basin contains approximately 4 km of basin fill that records the onset of range uplift and eastward migration of deformation throughout the Mio-Pliocene (Carrapa et al, 2006(Carrapa et al, , 2008Safipour et al, 2015).…”
Section: Lithologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mud cracks, halite, and gypsum in the Neogene basin fill suggest that the region Figure 2. (a) Simplified geologic map with major structures of the Sierra de las Planchadas; data from Rubiolo et al (2009) andSafipour et al (2015). (b) Mean annual precipitation from Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 2B31 (Bookhagen & Strecker, 2008). has been arid since at least 9 Ma (Carrapa et al, 2006).…”
Section: Climatic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations