“…Understanding the early phase of retroarc foreland basin deformation is critical to better assess temporal estimates of shortening and the magnitude of underthrusting that may drive cycles in Cordilleran magmatism [ DeCelles et al ., , ], subduction slab inclination, and spatial shifts in major orogen‐scale topographic divides. Much emphasis has been placed on the late Miocene uplift history of the central Andes [ England and Molnar , ; Hoke and Garzione , ], while recent work in the central Andes has suggested a Paleocene onset of continuous foreland basin system development [ Carrapa et al ., , ], eastward progression of surface uplift [ Quade et al ., ], and basin partitioning by Sierras Pampeanas intraforeland uplifts [ Carrapa et al ., ; Ciccioli et al ., ; Carrapa and DeCelles , ; Safipour et al ., ]. Although Paleogene foreland sedimentation is well documented in NW Argentina between 24 and 28°S [ DeCelles et al ., ; Carrapa et al ., ], the early Cenozoic basin history between 28 and 34°S remains largely unconstrained and poorly documented, preventing a full understanding of what controls subduction margin segmentation, foreland basin connectivity, topographic evolution, and underlying geodynamic and surface processes.…”