2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-016-0983-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence and concentration of solution for a class of fractional elliptic equation in $$\mathbb {R}^N$$ R N via penalization method

Abstract: In this paper, we study the existence and concentration of positive solution for the following class of fractional elliptic equationwhere ǫ is a positive parameter, f has a subcritical growth, V possesses a local minimum, N > 2s, s ∈ (0, 1), and (−∆) s u is the fractional laplacian.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
210
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
210
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One is the L ∞ ‐estimate, owing to the work of Dipierro et al; similarly, we can get the L ∞ ‐estimate. The other is the decay estimate of solutions; with the help of previous works,() we can establish the decay estimate at infinity. Besides above, the novelty of this paper is that we add a potential K ( x ) on the nonlinearity term f ( t ); this will need more careful analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One is the L ∞ ‐estimate, owing to the work of Dipierro et al; similarly, we can get the L ∞ ‐estimate. The other is the decay estimate of solutions; with the help of previous works,() we can establish the decay estimate at infinity. Besides above, the novelty of this paper is that we add a potential K ( x ) on the nonlinearity term f ( t ); this will need more careful analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Proof For any ϵ n →0, wn:=wϵn is a positive ground state solution of problem ; then ffalse(x,wnfalse):=Kfalse(ϵnx+ϵnyϵnfalse)ffalse(wnfalse)+Qfalse(ϵnx+ϵnyϵnfalse)false|wn|2s2wnVfalse(ϵnx+ϵnyϵnfalse)wϵn+φwntwnCfalse(1+false|wn|2s1false), where C is independent of n and w n ; by the estimate , we have that ‖ w n ‖ ∞ ≤ C ‖ w n ‖ α ≤ C , where C > 0 is a constant independent of n . Now, we borrow the ideas in Alves and Miyagaki to complete the proof. For this purpose, we rewrite problem as follows: (Δ)swn+wn=gn(x), where g n ( x ): = w n + f ( x , w n ).…”
Section: Concentration Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the fact that the fractional Laplacian appears in a lot of application, several authors have dedicated a special attention for problems involving this important operator. The reader can find some recent results in Alves and Miyagaki [1,2], Brändler, Colorado and Sánchez [10], Cabré and Sire [14], Caffarelli and Silvestre [15], Chang and Wang [16], Cotsiolis and Tavoularis [18], Dávila, del Pino and Wei [19], Dipierro, Palatucci and Valdinoci [21], Fall, Mahmoudi and Valdinoci [25], Felmer, Quaas and Tan [26], Palatucci and Pisante [30], Secchi [32], Silvestre [33] and their references. In the most part of the above references the variational method was used to show the existence of solution.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the Theorem is obtained by applying critical point theory after transforming into an elliptic nonlinear Neumann problem in a half‐cylinder via a suitable variant of the extension method introduced by Caffarelli and Silvestre in . This approach has been brilliantly used by several authors to study existence, multiplicity, regularity and symmetry properties of solutions for different fractional problems (in RN or in bounded domains) involving subcritical and critical nonlinearities; see for instance . Taking into account this fact, instead of , we are lead to consider the following degenerate elliptic problem with a nonlinear Neumann boundary condition {0.16emprefixdiv(y12sU)=0inC:=Ω×(0,),U=0onLC:=Ω×false[0,false),Uν12s=κsfalse[f(x,u)+tφ1+hfalse]on0C:=Ω×false{0false},where κs is a suitable positive constant (see ) and u is the trace of U (see Section 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%