2023
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.14476
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence and rotatability of the two-colored Jones-Wenzl projector

Abstract: The two-colored Temperley-Lieb algebra 2TL R ( s n) is a generalization of the Temperley-Lieb algebra. The analogous two-colored Jones-Wenzl projector JW R ( s n) ∈ 2TL R ( s n) plays an important role in the Elias-Williamson construction of the diagrammatic Hecke category. We give conditions for the existence and rotatability of JW R ( s n) in terms of the invertibility and vanishing of certain two-colored quantum binomial coefficients. As a consequence, we prove that Abe's category of Soergel bimodules is eq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We start by observing that under condition (1), homotopical Nboundedness is characterised as in the last phrase of the theorem. Indeed, by construction and the defining property of rotatability in [Ha,§2], both conditions in Corollary 3.1.4 become equivalent under assumption (1).…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We start by observing that under condition (1), homotopical Nboundedness is characterised as in the last phrase of the theorem. Indeed, by construction and the defining property of rotatability in [Ha,§2], both conditions in Corollary 3.1.4 become equivalent under assumption (1).…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Proposition 1.4.7(3) there exists an l ≤ n that does not divide m with [[l]] R = 0. By maximality of m we also know that m does not divide l. But [Ha,Lemma 3.4] then implies that [[m]] R and [[l]] R cannot both be zero, a contradiction. The identical argument for R ′ concludes the proof.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[EW3,§7]), but we will not consider this question here. Assumptions ( 2) and ( 3) are also necessary for the theory of [EW2], hence also for all of its applications, although this was not made explicit before [EW3,Ha]. (In particular, they should be imposed in [AMRW1] and in [ARV].)…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%