Exklamativsätze im FrameNet-Konstruktikon am Beispiel des Englischen

Ziem, Alexander; Ellsworth, Michael

doi:10.1515/9783110423112-006

Cited by 5 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the remainder of this paper, we demonstrate how the empirical and theoretical insights about the syntax-lexicon continuum should drive the design of a constructicon for German. Building on findings in previous works (e.g., Boas, 2014;Ziem, 2014a;Ziem, Boas & Ruppenhofer, 2014;Ziem & Ellsworth, 2016), we specifically investigate what types of construction entries from the English constructicon Boas, 2017) can be reused for creating parallel construction entries for a German constructicon. This is similar to proposals in for reusing English semantic frames for other languages (see also Lyngfelt, Torrent et al, this volume).…”

Section: The 'Continuum Of Constructional Correspondences': Consequences For the Design Of A German Constructiconmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is similar to proposals in for reusing English semantic frames for other languages (see also Lyngfelt, Torrent et al, this volume). Specifically, we discuss and compare three types of constructions in German and English, ranging from quasi synonymous and structurally homologous ones, such as the just_because_doesn't_mean construction, to constructions with more or less language-specific characteristics, such as the family of exclamative constructions (d'Avis, 2013;Michaelis, 2001;Ziem & Ellsworth, 2016) and the way construction (Goldberg, 1995, pp. 199-218;Oya, 1999).…”

Section: The 'Continuum Of Constructional Correspondences': Consequences For the Design Of A German Constructiconmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Even though forms and functions of exclamatives are well-examined (Zanuttini & Portner, 2009;d'Avis, 2013;Rett, 2009), most studies do not advance a constructional approach (for an exception cf. Michaelis, 2001;Ziem & Ellsworth, 2016). Across the stances taken in these studies, it is common sense that exclamatives constitute a sentence type that allows to express a speaker's surprise with regard to any kind of perceived entity, including events, situations, and objects the speaker comes across (d'Avis, 2013, p. 171;Rett, 2009, p. 607), provided that what is evoking the surprise diverges significantly from an expected default.…”

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Building on prior research such as Boas (2014), Ziem (2014a), Ziem, Boas andRuppenhofer (2014), Ziem and Ellsworth (2016), Boas, Dux and Ziem (2016) and the contributions in Boas and Ziem (in press a), we investigate what types of construction entries from the English constructicon ) can be reused for creating parallel construction entries for a German constructicon (similar to proposals in for reusing English semantic frames for other languages). Specifically, we discuss and compare three constructions in German and English, ranging from quasi synonymous and structurally homologous ones, such as the just_because_doesn't_mean construction, to constructions with significant language-specific characteristics, such as the way construction Oya, 1999) and the family of exclamative constructions (d'Avis, 2013;Michaelis, 2001;Ziem & Ellsworth, 2016). 1 The empirical evidence leads us to propose a "continuum of constructional correspondence" to argue that reusing English construction entries has only limited benefits.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We begin with the linguistic unit evoking a construction, which is called a 'Construction Evoking Element' (CEE). 18 To illustrate, consider (5), an instantiation of an exclamative construction (Ziem & Ellsworth, 2016), discussed in detail in Section 4.2.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Constructicography

Ohara¹,

Torrent²,

Lyngfelt³

et al. 2018

Constructional Approaches to Language

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This book has been long in the making, but now having the result under our eyes, we believe that it was worth the wait. The idea of compiling a volume collecting the experiences of the various constructicon initiatives going on around the world was born in the context of an international collaboration between the universities at Gothenburg in Sweden and Juiz de Fora in Brazil, and the excellent opportunities to interact and learn from each other's experiences afforded by both research visits and the international FrameNet workshops organized jointly by the Swedish and Brazilian teams, together with the FrameNet group in Berkeley, California: IFNW 2013 in Berkeley, IFNW 2016, collocated with ICCG9 in Juiz de Fora, and the upcoming IFNW 2018 with the special theme Multilingual FrameNets and Constructicons, collocated with LREC in Miyazaki, Japan. Moreover, profitable discussions relevant to the works presented in this book took place in the special sessions Cognitively grounded lexica, constructicons, and metaphor repositories, at ICLC12 in Edmonton, Canada, in 2013, and Constructionist resources -a workshop in honor of Charles J. Fillmore, at ICCG8 in Osnabrück, Germany, in 2014.During these events, most -if not all -authors of the chapters in this volume had the chance to share their points of view, positions and questions on the development of constructionist resources. Beyond the group of authors whose contributions make this book, we'd like to thank our -and their -interlocutors.The work on preparing the volume has been funded in part by the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT), by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brazil), and by the Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences (Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, RJ), but it could not have happened without the long-term support given to both Språkbanken (the Swedish Language Bank) -now well into its fifth decade -by the University of Gothenburg, its Faculty of Arts and its Department of Swedish, and to FrameNet Brasil by the Federal University of Juiz de Fora.The volume editors would like to express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their thorough and insightful comments and suggestions, to the series editor Jan-Ola Östman for his final vetting of the volume, and to Esther Roth and Susan Hendriks at John Benjamins, always helpful and unerringly professional, under whose watchful eyes the volume went from idea to finished product. Last but viii Constructicography not least, we are grateful to the person without whom none of all this would have happened: the late Charles J. Fillmore. For inspiring us all, for being a core element in our research frame(works), for having guided our ways into the development of constructicons, and for being such a great guy, we dedicate this volume to Chuck.

show abstract

Section: The 'Continuum Of Constructional Correspondences': Consequences For the Design Of A German Constructiconmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The 'Continuum Of Constructional Correspondences': Consequences For the Design Of A German Constructiconmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: 2mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Constructicography

Ohara¹,

Torrent²,

Lyngfelt³

et al. 2018

Constructional Approaches to Language

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Funktionsverbgefüge go digital: Leistungen von Funktionsverbgefügen in der Interaktion auf Twitter

Kabatnik¹

2023

Digitale Pragmatik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Konstruktion von Sprache und Sprachwissen

Schaller¹

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Referenzbereiche als Grössen metasprachlicher Reflexion 140 8.2.2 Herleitung der Codes und Subcodes für die Annotation 141 8.3 Textvariablen (Teilkorpus C) 145 8.3.1 Positionierungsprozeduren 145 8.3.2 Lexik, Grammatik und Orthographie 148 8.3.3 Syntaktische Komplexität 152 9 Erhebungsinstrumente und Methode 154 9.1 Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente 154 9.1.1 Erhebung allgemeiner Daten sowie des sozioökonomischen Status 154 9.1.2 Erhebung der globalen Sprachkompetenz (C-Test) 157 9.1.3 Erhebung der Kompetenz in der Lexik, der Grammatik und der Orthographie 167 9.1.4 Erhebung des Textes 171 9.1.5 Erhebung des Schreibprozesses durch Keystroke Logging 173 9.1.6 Erhebung und Aufbereitung der Daten zum explizierten Sprachwissen 175 9.1.7 Erhebung des Selbstkonzepts der Kinder 178 9.1.8 Erhebung kognitiver Grundfähigkeiten 180 9.2 Beschreibung der Datenerhebung 181 9.2.1 Rekrutierung der teilnehmenden Kinder und Klassen 181 9.2.2 Ablauf der einzelnen Erhebungen 182 9.3 Methoden der Datenanalyse und untersuchte Gruppen 183 9.3.1 Form und Auswertung der Daten 184 9.3.2 Überblick über die untersuchten Probandengruppen 184 9.3.3 Übersicht über die statistischen Verfahren 185 10

show abstract

Exklamativsätze im FrameNet-Konstruktikon am Beispiel des Englischen

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Constructicography

Constructicography

Funktionsverbgefüge go digital: Leistungen von Funktionsverbgefügen in der Interaktion auf Twitter

Konstruktion von Sprache und Sprachwissen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About