2008
DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-1-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the clinical phenotype of the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome and characterization of the reciprocal microduplication

Abstract: Background: Interstitial deletions of 3q29 have been recently described as a microdeletion syndrome mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination between low-copy repeats resulting in an ~1.6 Mb common-sized deletion. Given the molecular mechanism causing the deletion, the reciprocal duplication is anticipated to occur with equal frequency, although only one family with this duplication has been reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
241
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
20
241
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 For many of the recurrent microdeletion syndromes caused by NAHR, reciprocal microduplications have been identified and 16 has a reciprocal microduplication that is also characterized by variable phenotypes (OMIM 611936). 17 Two more well-characterized examples are Williams syndrome (OMIM 194050), due to a microdeletion at 7q11.23, and its reciprocal microduplication syndrome (OMIM 609757); 18,19 and Smith-Magenis syndrome (OMIM 182290), due to microdeletion at 17p11.2, and Potocki-Lupski syndrome (OMIM 610883), caused by the reciprocal microduplication. 20,21 Analysis of the phenotypic consequences of the reciprocal NF1 microduplications, however, has been reported in detail in just one multigenerational family.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 For many of the recurrent microdeletion syndromes caused by NAHR, reciprocal microduplications have been identified and 16 has a reciprocal microduplication that is also characterized by variable phenotypes (OMIM 611936). 17 Two more well-characterized examples are Williams syndrome (OMIM 194050), due to a microdeletion at 7q11.23, and its reciprocal microduplication syndrome (OMIM 609757); 18,19 and Smith-Magenis syndrome (OMIM 182290), due to microdeletion at 17p11.2, and Potocki-Lupski syndrome (OMIM 610883), caused by the reciprocal microduplication. 20,21 Analysis of the phenotypic consequences of the reciprocal NF1 microduplications, however, has been reported in detail in just one multigenerational family.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Whole-genome bacterial artificial chromosome-based microarray analysis was originally performed on DNA from subject 4 as previously described. 17 Oligonucleotide-based microarray analysis was originally performed on DNA from subjects 5, 6, and 7 using a custom 12-plex 135K-feature whole-genome oligonucleotide microarray (SignatureChip Oligo Solution v2.0, custom-designed by Signature Genomic Laboratories, Spokane, WA, and manufactured by Roche NimbleGen, Madison, WI) using previously described methods. 25 DNA from subjects 1, 2, and 4 were rerun on the SignatureChip Oligo Solution v2.0 12-plex to refine the size of the duplication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all studies the case-enriched CNVs are typically very rare with the most common loci being hotspots where the copy number of flanking segmental duplications lead to an elevated local mutation rate Ballif et al, 2008]. In general, potentially pathogenic duplications are more enriched for the larger size range (>500 kbp) while deletions begin to manifest enrichments at a smaller size range.…”
Section: Cnv Landscape Of Neuropsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes in important developmental pathways are also covered by contigs of BACs to fill in the chromosome arms and provide higher resolution with an average gap size between contigs of ϳ1.6 Mb. 17 Microarray analysis was performed as described. 17 …”
Section: Microarray Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%