2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10482-020-01448-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the host range: infection of a reptilian host (Furcifer pardalis) by an atypical Brucella strain

Abstract: Atypical brucellae show deviant phenotypes and/or genotypes. Besides Brucella inopinata, B. microti and B. vulpis, atypical strains have been described infecting humans, rodents, amphibians and fish. They represent potential zoonotic agents. Here, we provide evidence that reptiles as the remaining poikilothermic vertebrate class also represent susceptible hosts for atypical Brucella.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2020), reptiles (Eisenberg et al. 2020), and a saltwater fish (Eisenberg et al. 2017), extend the host range of the infection, suggesting that the epidemiology of brucellosis may be even more complex in the aquatic environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2020), reptiles (Eisenberg et al. 2020), and a saltwater fish (Eisenberg et al. 2017), extend the host range of the infection, suggesting that the epidemiology of brucellosis may be even more complex in the aquatic environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several aspects of the epidemiology of infection in the marine environment remain to be elucidated, including the identification of the reservoirs of several strains of B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis and the role of lung nematodes in infection transmission (Rhyan et al 2018). The recent reports of natural Brucella infections in cold-blooded animals, including amphibians (Jaÿ et al 2020), reptiles (Eisenberg et al 2020), and a saltwater fish (Eisenberg et al 2017), extend the host range of the infection, suggesting that the epidemiology of brucellosis may be even more complex in the aquatic environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other species genetically related to an atypical group within the genus have been described in different host species: Brucella microti -like in marsh frogs ( Pelophylax ridibundus ) [ 11 ]; Brucella vulpis in the red fox ( V. vulpes ) [ 13 ]; Brucella inopinata in White’s and Denny’s tree frogs, ( Ranoidea caerulea and Zhangixalus dennysi ) [ 169 ] and humans; Brucella papionis in baboons ( Papio spp.) [ 15 ], without mentioning Brucella strains isolates from lungworms in porpoise ( Phocoena phocoena ) [ 170 ], blue-spotted ribbontail ray ( Taeniura lymma ) [ 171 ] and reptile panther chameleon ( Furcifer pardalis ) [ 172 ].…”
Section: Reservoirs In Wildlifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brucella is a Gram-negative intracellular pathogen that causes brucellosis [1], it usually can be divided into 12 species in nature, including six so-called classic Brucella species, namely B. melitensis, B. abortus, B. suis, B. canis, B. ovis and B. neotomae, and six newly discovered Brucella species from wild mammals, amphibians and fish, namely B. microti, B. pinnipidialis, B. ceti, B. inopinata, B. papionis and B. vulpis. In the genus Brucella, B. melitensis, B. abortus and B. suis have good clinical significance [2][3][4]. Brucellosis in animals manifests itself in miscarriages and reduced fertility and is transmitted to humans by inhaling aerosolised bacteria or ingesting contaminated derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and B. suis have good clinical significance [2][3][4]. Brucellosis in animals manifests itself in miscarriages and reduced fertility and is transmitted to humans by inhaling aerosolized bacteria or ingesting contaminated derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%