Expanding the I–II–V Phase Space: Soft Synthesis of Polytypic Ternary and Binary Zinc Antimonides

Abstract

Soft chemistry methods offer the possibility of synthesizing metastable and kinetic products that are unobtainable through thermodynamically-controlled, high-temperature reactions. A recent solution-phase exploration of Li-Zn-Sb phase space revealed a previously unknown cubic half-Heusler MgAgAs-type LiZnSb polytype. Interestingly, this new cubic phase was calculated to be the most thermodynamically stable, despite prior literature reporting only two other ternary phases (the hexagonal half-Heusler LiGaGe-type LiZnSb, and the full-Heusler Li2ZnSb). This surprising discovery, coupled with the intriguing optoelectronic and transport properties of many antimony containing Zintl phases, required a thorough exploration of syn-thetic parameters. Here, we systematically study the effects that different precursor concentrations, injection order, nucleation and growth temperatures, and reaction time have on the solution-phase synthesis of these materials. By doing so, we identify conditions that selectively yield several unique ternary (c-LiZnSb vs. h*-LiZnSb), binary (ZnSb vs. Zn8Sb7), and metallic (Zn, Sb) products. Further, we find one of the ternary phases adopts a variant of the previously observed hexagonal LiZnSb struc-ture. Our results demonstrate the utility of low temperature solution phase-soft synthesis-methods in accessing and mining a rich phase space. We anticipate that this work will motivate further exploration of multinary I-II-V compounds, as well as encourage similarly thorough investigations of related Zintl systems by solution phase methods. Disciplines Materials ChemistryComments "This document is the unedited Author's version of a Submitted Work that was subsequently accepted for publication in Chemistry of Materials, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review. To access the final edited and published work see http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02910. ABSTRACT: Soft chemistry methods offer the possibility of synthesizing metastable and kinetic products that are unobtainable through thermodynamically-controlled, high-temperature reactions. A recent solution-phase exploration of Li-Zn-Sb phase space revealed a previously unknown cubic half-Heusler MgAgAs-type LiZnSb polytype. Interestingly, this new cubic phase was calculated to be the most thermodynamically stable, despite prior literature reporting only two other ternary phases (the hexagonal half-Heusler LiGaGe-type LiZnSb, and the full-Heusler Li2ZnSb). This surprising discovery, coupled with the intriguing optoelectronic and transport properties of many antimony containing Zintl phases, required a thorough exploration of synthetic parameters. Here, we systematically study the effects that different precursor concentrations, injection order, nucleation and growth temperatures, and reaction time have on the solution-phase synthesis of these materials. By doing so, we identify conditions that selectively yield several unique ternary (c-LiZnSb vs. h*-LiZnSb), binary (ZnSb vs. Zn8Sb7), and metallic (Zn, Sb) products. Furt...

Control of polymorphism during epitaxial growth of hyperferroelectric candidate LiZnSb on GaSb (111)B

“…Projecting the measured 10 13 h and 220 c reflections to the growth plane, we find in-plane lattice parameters of a = 4.43 Å for hexagonal and d ,110 = 4.39 Å for cubic, respectively. These measurements are in good agreement with previous measurements on bulk samples, which report a = 4.43 Å for hexagonal [7,8,13] and d 110 = a √ 2 = 4.41 Å for cubic [7,15]. For the singlephase hexagonal film grown at 150 • C, we also observe finite thickness fringes in the 2θ scan (Fig.…”

“…This result is somewhat surprising in light of our DFT calculations for bulk LiZnSb, which show that the cubic phase has lower energy than the hexagonal phase by about 35 meV per formula unit, comparable to the previously reported value of 30 meV [7], and hence the cubic is the expected stable phase. The results are similar using both LDA (local density approximation) and GGA (generalized gradient approximation) functionals [15]. Note, however, that 30-35 meV per formula unit is similar in magnitude to the thermal energy, k B T = 40meV, at a growth temperature of 200 • C. Therefore we do not expect a strong thermodynamic driving force to prefer one phase over the other.…”

“…We computed the energy to remove one Li atom from a 72 atom hexagonal supercell, with the supercells in the cubic and hexagonal structures having almost identical shapes, using a 8 × 8 × 4 k-point mesh. = 7.19 Å (a = 6.23 Å [7,15]). For bulk hexagonal LiZnSb the experimental lattice parameters range from c = 7.15 Å to 7.24 Å depending on Li stoichiometry [8,13,14], and c = 6.02 Å for 2D-ZnSb [8].…”

Ligand-Mediated Phase Control in Colloidal AgInSe2 Nanocrystals

“…[9][10][11][12][13] Because the physical properties of a material are linked to its crystalline structure, the ability to isolate new or difficult-to-access metastable structures on the nanoscale holds promise for the discovery of novel functional materials with properties different from, and possibly superior to, the properties of more thermodynamically stable materials. [14][15][16][17][18] To synthetically target such materials, it is important to consider that a metastable state is only isolable if, under some set of conditions, that state represents a thermodynamic minimum. 5 In other words, if a state is never the thermodynamically most stable state under any set of conditions, it is not synthesizable.…”

Structural evolution in thermoelectric zinc antimonide thin films studied by in situ X-ray scattering techniques

“…Aside from the interest in the excellent thermoelectric properties, the extreme structural diversity of the zinc-antimony binary phase diagram has also been intensively investigated. Recently, Lo et al (2018) updated the Zn-Sb phase diagram, and White et al (2018) explored the Li-Zn-Sb phase diagram using a solution-phase method. It is now established that there exists a large number of unique Zn-Sb phases within a narrow compositional range (50-60 at% Zn) including ZnSb (Telkes, 1947), Zn 8 Sb 7 (Pomrehn et al, 2011;Wang & Kovnir, 2015), Zn 9 Sb 7 (He et al, 2015), Zn 4 Sb 3 (Caillat et al, 1997) and Zn 3 Sb 2 (Lo et al, 2017;Boströ m & Lidin, 2004).…”