1984
DOI: 10.1021/ma00139a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansion factor of a part of a polymer chain in a good solvent measured by small-angle neutron scattering

Abstract: mation prior to publication.Registry No. (Butadiene) (homopolymer), 9003-17-2; (butadiene)-(styrene) (copolymer), 9003-55-8.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the value evaluated for a DP20 solution ( ¢ = 0.111) by the fitting procedure is about 24.6 nm, higher than the value in 8 solvents (17 .1 nm), but close to 23.8 nm in good solvents at infinite dilution. 27 Therefore, we conclude that the fitted results are close to the values at infinite dilution and further speculate that block copolymers in the disordered semidilute re-392 0. 25.---~----.----.---~----.----.--- gion are expanded in common good solvents from the unperturbed dimension by excluded volume effects, similarly to homopolymer solutions in the semidilute region, 28 and also by fluctuation effect existing near ODT.3,s,7 Mayes et al, 29 reported that the concentration dependence of the correlation length of the semidilute block copolymer solution is consistent with the scaling prediction in the semidilute region, whereas the concentration dependence of q* ( (S 2 ) 112 ) is weaker than the prediction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the value evaluated for a DP20 solution ( ¢ = 0.111) by the fitting procedure is about 24.6 nm, higher than the value in 8 solvents (17 .1 nm), but close to 23.8 nm in good solvents at infinite dilution. 27 Therefore, we conclude that the fitted results are close to the values at infinite dilution and further speculate that block copolymers in the disordered semidilute re-392 0. 25.---~----.----.---~----.----.--- gion are expanded in common good solvents from the unperturbed dimension by excluded volume effects, similarly to homopolymer solutions in the semidilute region, 28 and also by fluctuation effect existing near ODT.3,s,7 Mayes et al, 29 reported that the concentration dependence of the correlation length of the semidilute block copolymer solution is consistent with the scaling prediction in the semidilute region, whereas the concentration dependence of q* ( (S 2 ) 112 ) is weaker than the prediction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…(S 2 ) 112 evaluated for DP17 in bulk in the disordered states by the fitting procedure are almost constant around 3.3 nm, close to the value of polystyrene with the same degree of polymerization in e solvents (3.1 nm). 27 Almost the same fitting procedure can be used for DP19 and DP20 solutions in the disordered state using the floating base line and peak height as additional fitting parameters. If Leibler's theory is also applicable to these (semidilute) solutions, (S 2 ) 112 can be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the ν value for a linear polymer in a good solvent is approximately 3/5, which was obtained from the neutron and light scattering experiments. [4][5][6][7] The ν values from the experiments agree well with those predicted by the theoretical studies [8][9][10] and the simulations, [11][12][13][14][15] where chain trajectories can be described with a self-avoiding walk (SAW), because the chains bear excluded volumes. a) Electronic mail: jiro.suzuki@kek.jp.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…To explain this finding, we approximate the PS part of each PS-b-PEO molecule as an ellipse with a longer radius of d PS_PREDICTED /2 ≈ 5.5 nm and a shorter radius x. To find the value of x, we equate a volume of such an ellipse with a volume a sphere with the PS gyration radius, 52 R G,PS in a toluene is 10−30% more, 53 so we estimate that R G,PS = 3.8 ± 0.5 nm. Then, we find that x ≈ 3.5 nm, which makes the PS component to be about 1 nm thicker than the PEO cylinder.…”
Section: Application Of Local Heat To Induce Fingerprintmentioning
confidence: 99%