Expectations, Trust, and ‘No Surprises’: Perceptions of Autonomy in New Zealand Crown Entities

Abstract

How autonomous are New Zealand Crown entities really? Although agencification and the autonomy of governmental agenda has been high on the research agenda in most modern industrialised jurisdictions since the mid-1990s, the discussion in New Zealand on the role of the Crown entities has more indirectly touched upon this issue. Based on the international literature on agency autonomy, this article presents new empirical evidence. The study is based on semi-structured elite interviews with retired Chief Executives of various Crown entities. The study shows that autonomy is a multifaceted concept in the New Zealand agency context, and does not necessarily means a vertical connection to the responsible ministry or to the board.

The growth of organisational professionals in tertiary educational institutions in New Zealand

“…To the latter category belong some of the challenges of securing accountability in the new system from politicians, CEs and other key participants (Schick, 1996). There have been many attempts to resolve these issues with accountability such as the 2004 Crown Entities Act (Löfgren et al. , 2018), and the continuous development with governance boards, but it is still an infested area.…”

Who is leading China's family planning policy discourse in Weibo? A social media text mining analysis

“…In any democratic polity, the government's responsiveness to the public's policy preferences is an enduring issue (Barberá et al, 2019;Guntermann & Persson, 2021;Im et al, 2013;Löfgren et al, 2018). Even though China is a one-party state, the lack of public engagement in policy issues, such as family planning programs, may still affect citizen support, subsequently affecting the legitimacy of the government policy (Wang & Chen, 2016).…”