2012
DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2012.646711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience Counts: Mixed Member Elections and Mexico's Chamber of Deputies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Mexico, where legislators are constitutionally prohibited from seeking immediate reelection to the same office, one would expect very little provision of particularistic benefits. Indeed, research on Mexican legislative behavior has suggested legislators have few incentives to engage in constituency service or pork‐barreling activities due to the lack of reelection, party voting in the electorate, and strong party control over the candidate‐selection process (Casar ; Freidenberg ; Nacif ; Ugues Jr., Medina Vidal, and Bowler ; Weldon ; Wuhs ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Mexico, where legislators are constitutionally prohibited from seeking immediate reelection to the same office, one would expect very little provision of particularistic benefits. Indeed, research on Mexican legislative behavior has suggested legislators have few incentives to engage in constituency service or pork‐barreling activities due to the lack of reelection, party voting in the electorate, and strong party control over the candidate‐selection process (Casar ; Freidenberg ; Nacif ; Ugues Jr., Medina Vidal, and Bowler ; Weldon ; Wuhs ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most relevant are the studies of Ugues, Vidal, and Bowler (2012) and Kerevel (2015), who leveraged Mexico's MMM (mixed-member majoritarian) system to compare the legislative behavior of federal legislators elected by PR (proportional representation) with those elected in SSDs (single-seat districts). Ugues, Vidal, and Bowler (2012) hypothesize that SSD legislators would be more likely to focus on committees that influence the allocation of funds that could benefit their districts. The authors find no significant difference in the types of committees termlimited legislators serve irrespective of how they were elected.…”
Section: Legislative Behavior and The Party-centered Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si bien algunos estudios han analizado la asignación de presidentes de comisión en la Cámara de Diputados mexicana, estos se han enfocado en las estrategias de selección seguidas por los coordinadores tanto para incrementar la influencia de sus respectivas bancadas como para procurar una mejor relación de sus partidos con el electorado y otros actores influyentes (Aparicio y Langston, 2009;Ugues et al, 2012). Empero, la naturaleza teórico-metodológica de estos trabajos no permite dar cuenta de cómo tales asignaciones se vinculan a la institucionalización de la asamblea, entendida esta como un proceso de larga duración.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified