1994
DOI: 10.2166/wst.1994.0609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience on anaerobic treatment of distillery effluent with the UASB process

Abstract: Since the development of the UASB process in the 1970s this process has been widely applied for the treatment of industrial effluents. Effluents from alcohol producing industries are mostly highly polluted and therefore in principle very suitable for anaerobic treatment. Distilleries use different kinds of raw materials such as sugar cane juice, sugar cane molasses, sugar beet molasses, wine or corn for the production of alcohol. The use of different materials and the different processes applied… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
28
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These values were found to be similar to those previously reported by Wolmarans and De Villiers (2002), Moosbrugger et al (1993) and Driessen et al (1994). The large fluctuations in the characteristics of wine distillery wastewater can be attributed to the type of product generated, the type of feedstock used and the distillery-specific integrated waste management practices adopted.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These values were found to be similar to those previously reported by Wolmarans and De Villiers (2002), Moosbrugger et al (1993) and Driessen et al (1994). The large fluctuations in the characteristics of wine distillery wastewater can be attributed to the type of product generated, the type of feedstock used and the distillery-specific integrated waste management practices adopted.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Significant amount of nitrification was reported in their experiment which reduced the organic matter [8]. Driessen was reduced 80-85% of BOD 5 of waste water in the lab scale combined treatment system in Germany [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On day-9 and further, still increase although the rate are quite constant. COD removal efficiencies in the range of 60-95% can be achieved depending on the process conditions [4], proven that UASB can remove COD, beside the zeolite also can help in process of removal. Therefore, this experiment succeed in removing average 74% COD where the raw concentration is 14 640 mg/L until day-30 decrease to 2,330 mg/L.…”
Section: Fig 3 Cod and Bod Percentage Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%