2020
DOI: 10.1190/int-2019-0307.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience on controlled-source electromagnetic performance for exploration in Norway

Abstract: We analyze the predictive performance of CSEM using a large statistical database. The prediction strength is quantified by comparing the CSEM interpretation to exploration drilling results for more than 100 wells in Norway. The comparison has been done by correlating inversion results for all surveys covering these wells with the well outcome, using a statistically driven anomaly detection workflow in order to avoid confirmation bias. The comparison is summarized by classifying the interpretations as true posi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In geological settings of moderate complexity and in the absence of non‐hydrocarbon‐related resistors (so called antimodels), large shallow hydrocarbon accumulations are easily detected and mapped by inverting CSEM data, even if image resolution and vertical positioning accuracy are limited. CSEM has for instance a good track record for exploration and de‐risking of shallow prospects in the Norwegian Barents Sea, where seismic often cannot discriminate between non‐commercial gas accumulations and profitable hydrocarbon‐filled traps (Berre et al., 2020; Fanavoll et al., 2014; Gabrielsen et al., 2013; Granli et al., 2017; Løseth et al., 2014; Løseth et al., 2015; Nordskag et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In geological settings of moderate complexity and in the absence of non‐hydrocarbon‐related resistors (so called antimodels), large shallow hydrocarbon accumulations are easily detected and mapped by inverting CSEM data, even if image resolution and vertical positioning accuracy are limited. CSEM has for instance a good track record for exploration and de‐risking of shallow prospects in the Norwegian Barents Sea, where seismic often cannot discriminate between non‐commercial gas accumulations and profitable hydrocarbon‐filled traps (Berre et al., 2020; Fanavoll et al., 2014; Gabrielsen et al., 2013; Granli et al., 2017; Løseth et al., 2014; Løseth et al., 2015; Nordskag et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods were originally developed for land application, but only used in limited cases. The success in the marine EM market proofed the technology value and its commercial viability [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromagnetic monitoring technology is now well proven [5][6][7][8] for hydrocarbon applications while in the 1980s was still in the research phase [6]. The equipment is fully commercial, software algorithms are well tested, and surface measurements confirm in many cases borehole measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromagnetic monitoring technology is now well proven [5][6][7][8] for hydrocarbon applications, while in the 1980s it was still in the research phase [6]. The equipment is fully commercial, software algorithms are well tested, and surface measurements confirm in many cases' borehole measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods were originally developed for land application, but only used in limited cases. The success in the marine EM market proofed the technology value and its commercial viability [8]. While the methodology, instruments, and interpretation methods are mature, they are not commercial enough to let the business drive the technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%