2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45490-x_76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiencing NetPeas: Another Qay of Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…s By adopting DSM to develop a peer assessment modeling language, we began by selecting various categories of vocabularies based on the conceptual framework and clarifying their pedagogical semantics and operational semantics. We reviewed relevant literature (e.g., Joosten-ten Brinke et al 2007;Liu, 2001;Sitthiworachart, 2003;Sluijsmans, 2002;Topping, 1998;and Volder, 2007) In this way, we have identified all vocabularies and specified the semantics and syntax for the peer assessment modeling language. When we put all vocabularies together and specify their relations, a meta-model of peer assessment processes has been defined.…”
Section: The Development Of a Peer Assessment Modeling Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…s By adopting DSM to develop a peer assessment modeling language, we began by selecting various categories of vocabularies based on the conceptual framework and clarifying their pedagogical semantics and operational semantics. We reviewed relevant literature (e.g., Joosten-ten Brinke et al 2007;Liu, 2001;Sitthiworachart, 2003;Sluijsmans, 2002;Topping, 1998;and Volder, 2007) In this way, we have identified all vocabularies and specified the semantics and syntax for the peer assessment modeling language. When we put all vocabularies together and specify their relations, a meta-model of peer assessment processes has been defined.…”
Section: The Development Of a Peer Assessment Modeling Languagementioning
confidence: 99%