2018
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aad11f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental analysis of electrical discharge coating characteristics of magnesium alloy using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides that, it can be seen that also the coating layer thickness increased significantly when a higher pulse on time was used. These results agree with those obtained by Chakraborty et al [5] and Elaiyarasan et al [19]. At a low pulse on-time value, the material deposition was lower due to the smaller plasma channel diameter.…”
Section: Effect Of Peak Current and Pulse On Time On The Coating Layer Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Besides that, it can be seen that also the coating layer thickness increased significantly when a higher pulse on time was used. These results agree with those obtained by Chakraborty et al [5] and Elaiyarasan et al [19]. At a low pulse on-time value, the material deposition was lower due to the smaller plasma channel diameter.…”
Section: Effect Of Peak Current and Pulse On Time On The Coating Layer Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Uniform deposition was observed at electrode prepared with high compaction load full sintered electrode as depicted in Figure 4(a-b) and small craters also identified in the surface, which shows the smooth surface. Figure 4(c-d) shows the SEM image of bulk deposition and bigger craters, formed at low compaction load partial sintered electrode, which provides the poorer surface finish [13]. The values of MH are high at low compaction load partially sintered electrode than filly sintered condition because hard deposition is formed in this condition, therefore MH is high.…”
Section: Effect Of Compaction Load On Mmr and Mhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANOVA table for the quadratic model for DR and EWR are given in Tables 4 and 5. The standard F distribution percentage point for confidence level limits for 95% and 99% are 4.06 and 7.87 respectively [9]. From the ANOVA tables, the F point for lack fit is 3.68 and 3.25 respectively which is smaller than the standard F value, thus the developed models are adequate.…”
Section: Mathematical Modeling Of Dr and Ewrmentioning
confidence: 87%