1995
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4534(95)00262-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental analysis of the magnetic field shielding and trapping properties of bulk melt-processed YBa2Cu3O7−δ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was achieved by zero-field cooling ͑ZFC͒ and then subjecting the sample to an increasing magnetic field, ramped linearly for 0.05 s to some value exceeding twice the full-penetration field. 64 H z is then decreased towards zero at the same sweep rate. A constant time interval ͑10 s͒ was then employed in order to allow the trapped magnetic moment to relax due to flux creep effects.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was achieved by zero-field cooling ͑ZFC͒ and then subjecting the sample to an increasing magnetic field, ramped linearly for 0.05 s to some value exceeding twice the full-penetration field. 64 H z is then decreased towards zero at the same sweep rate. A constant time interval ͑10 s͒ was then employed in order to allow the trapped magnetic moment to relax due to flux creep effects.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference can be explained by the fact that the size of the inhomogeneities in our samples is lower as the resolution of the mapping device. Also in [14] the inhomogeneities of the shielded fields above the textured samples have been highly pronounced, however, at external magnetic fields, which were two orders higher than in this work. Figure 3 shows the ac magnetisation M vs. the applied field H0 (corrected by the demagnetisation factor) of the sample fabricated by the PMP technique for five magnetisation field amplitudes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Two possible scenarios prevail for a gain boundary or joint in the presence of an applied magnetic field. If the flux pinning force at the joint is weak and the critical current low, magnetic flux will penetrate readily between the grains and they will behave like two separate specimens [33]. However, this is not observed from the magnetic field distribution in Fig.…”
Section: Fig 7 a Sem Micrograph Showing The Non-uniform Growth Fronmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This shows a Hall probe map of the surface of two YBCO grains joined along their c-axis (i.e. with effectively no mismatch angle) in an external magnetic field of 10 mT in a field screening arrangement [33]. The position of the grains and the boundary and the magnitude of the field normal to the sample surface are indicated in the diagram.…”
Section: Fig 7 a Sem Micrograph Showing The Non-uniform Growth Fronmentioning
confidence: 99%