2012
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.51.04da03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Analytical Characterization of Dual-Gated Germanium Junctionless p-Channel Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fin width ( W fin ) is used for the channel concentration of 8 × 10 19 cm − 3 which is extracted using the van der Pauw method on a blanket Ge epi layer on SOI. Note that the channel controllability decreases with increasing channel concentration and increasing W fin [ 12 , 13 ]. The large channel concentration requires the small W fin to maintain the low SS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fin width ( W fin ) is used for the channel concentration of 8 × 10 19 cm − 3 which is extracted using the van der Pauw method on a blanket Ge epi layer on SOI. Note that the channel controllability decreases with increasing channel concentration and increasing W fin [ 12 , 13 ]. The large channel concentration requires the small W fin to maintain the low SS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of highly doped JL-FETs, the carriers undergo significant impurity scattering, owing to which the drive current is significantly degraded [ 7 ]. Furthermore, JL-FETs have the advantages of being simple to fabricate and have high charge mobility and low gate capacitance, in contrast to INV devices [ 8 12 ]. Recently, double-gate [ 13 ] and body-tied tri-gate [ 14 ] Ge JL-FET pMOSFETs were demonstrated on germanium-on-insulator substrates and bulk Si, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The JL FET is promising for advanced nanoscale CMOS technology, possessing many advantages over conventional MOSFET such as simplicity, improved short-channel effects, and relaxed mobility degradation. 35 However, its drawback has been the degradation of S/D contact resistance because it has a lower S/ D doping level than conventional MOSFET. Fortunately, adopting the proposed M−I−S structure in the S/D region easily solves this problem without the need to increase S/D doping level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The devices show similar current-voltage (I-V) characteristics to conventional FETs, and their on/off current ratio is larger than 10 4 . The fi eld-effect mobility is equal to 120 cm 2 /Vs and is independent of the channel carrier density (Zhao et al, 2011(Zhao et al, , 2012. N-channel germanium MOSFETs are notoriously diffi cult to fabricate and show poor performance despite the high mobility of electrons in bulk germanium.…”
Section: Germanium-on-insulator Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%