2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.12.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and analytical thermal analysis of cylindrical cavity receiver for solar dish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conduction heat loss from receiver is from bottom and curved surface (radial direction) of the receiver through the insulation. The conduction heat loss from the bottom and radial surface is estimated as [6] The heat loss resistance from the bottom and radial surface of the receiver is shown in figs. 5 and 6.…”
Section: Conduction Heat Loss Through the Receiver Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conduction heat loss from receiver is from bottom and curved surface (radial direction) of the receiver through the insulation. The conduction heat loss from the bottom and radial surface is estimated as [6] The heat loss resistance from the bottom and radial surface of the receiver is shown in figs. 5 and 6.…”
Section: Conduction Heat Loss Through the Receiver Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat loss by natural convection was observed to be more sensitive to the cavity inclination as compared to heat losses by radiation and conduction in constant heat flux boundary condition. Azzouzi et al [6] also presented the experimental and analytical study on the helical coil cavity receiver with non-uniform high temperature wall condition. Most of the numerical and experimental studies on heat loss are performed on cylindrical cavity receivers, used for isothermal wall condition and high temperature applications (>400 C) such as power generation, which cannot give accurate heat loss estimation for tubular cavity receivers for low and medium temperature process heat applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest optical efficiency was obtained with the conical receiver. Azzouzi et al (2017) experimentally and analytically studied the influence of the receiver inclination angle, water flow rate within the receiver, solar concentration ratio, and report/ ratio between the cavity depth and the aperture diameter L/D on the total heat loss and thermal efficiency of a downward-facing cavity receiver. The experimental and analytical thermal efficiency estimates are in relatively good agreement, with a maximum deviation of $12%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azzouzi et al. (2017) experimentally and analytically studied the influence of the receiver inclination angle, water flow rate within the receiver, solar concentration ratio, and report/ratio between the cavity depth and the aperture diameter L/D on the total heat loss and thermal efficiency of a downward-facing cavity receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cylindrical (Wang et al 2013;Azzouzi et al 2017;Karimi et al 2018;Loni et al 2018b, a;Soltani et al 2019), conical (Li et al 2015a;Pavlovic et al 2018;Awasthi andKhan 2019), spherical (Si-Quan et al 2018), modified cavity receivers (Sendhil Kumar and Reddy 2007a;Sendhil Kumar 2008, 2009;Reddy 2014, 2015;Reddy et al 2015cReddy et al , b, 2016 are some of the frequently used receiver types.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%