2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and computational investigation of hydrophilic monomeric substances as novel CO2 hydrate inhibitors and potential synergists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a KHI and a THI/synergist were used in combination, the peak values of C–O RDF decreased, indicating an increase in the distance between methane and water molecules, and the peak values of C–C RDF increased, indicating a decrease in the distance between methane–methane molecules and the methane-KHI carbon chains. Similar results have been reported by Wang et al and Go et al . based on MSD and RDF calculations.…”
Section: Synergy In Hydrate Inhibitionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When a KHI and a THI/synergist were used in combination, the peak values of C–O RDF decreased, indicating an increase in the distance between methane and water molecules, and the peak values of C–C RDF increased, indicating a decrease in the distance between methane–methane molecules and the methane-KHI carbon chains. Similar results have been reported by Wang et al and Go et al . based on MSD and RDF calculations.…”
Section: Synergy In Hydrate Inhibitionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Go et al conducted an experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study on the synergistic methane hydrate inhibition between urea, acetamide, and glycine. A similar study with synergistic hydrate inhibition was repeated for CO 2 hydrates …”
Section: Synergy In Hydrate Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At this level, there is almost no difference in the inhibition effect between methanol and ethylene glycol, although the peak position is further back in the localized region. Thus, the inhibitor dosage affects both the amount and location of hydrate formation in the pipeline …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the inhibitor dosage affects both the amount and location of hydrate formation in the pipeline. 29 Increasing the inhibitor concentration further (0.25%) slightly enhances the inhibition effect, with methanol and ethylene glycol still exhibiting similar performance. However, when the inhibitor concentration reaches 0.35%, a substantial increase in inhibition becomes apparent, and a significant difference in inhibition between methanol and ethylene glycol emerges.…”
Section: Effect Of the Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 97%