2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp06810k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and computational studies of Criegee intermediate reactions with NH3and CH3NH2

Abstract: The significance of removal of atmospheric ammonia and amines by reaction with Criegee intermediates is assessed by kinetic studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
55
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(68 reference statements)
9
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5, Top and Right Inset). These products are consistent with characteristic HCO 2 -loss (= protonated CI) and HO 2 -loss daughter ions (DIs) from the dissociative photoionization of the predicted functionalized hydroperoxide reaction product, HPBF (18,19,44). The formation of the hydroperoxide product is further evidenced by the agreement between the observed and calculated vertical ionization energies and appearance energies for the m/z 99 DI (further details in SI Appendix).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…5, Top and Right Inset). These products are consistent with characteristic HCO 2 -loss (= protonated CI) and HO 2 -loss daughter ions (DIs) from the dissociative photoionization of the predicted functionalized hydroperoxide reaction product, HPBF (18,19,44). The formation of the hydroperoxide product is further evidenced by the agreement between the observed and calculated vertical ionization energies and appearance energies for the m/z 99 DI (further details in SI Appendix).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…1,2,3,4,5 In particular, the CCSD(T) method (i.e., CC with single, double, and quasiperturbative triple excitations) 6,78 has been extensively used for obtaining reaction barrier heights in a wide range of chemical systems (for a few recent examples see refs. 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24). With the increase in available computational power and efficiency of quantum chemical codes, the calculation of reaction barrier heights with higher-order CC methods (normally up to CCSDT(Q)) has become more prevalent over the past decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These CIs have been identified with various detection methods, like photoionization mass spectrometry (Taatjes et al, 2013), infrared action (Liu et al, 2014b) and absorption Lin et al, 2015) spectroscopy, UV-visible spectroscopy (Beames et al, 2013;Sheps, 2013;Liu et al, 2014a;Ting et al, 2014;Smith et al, 40 2014;Chang et al, 2016), microwave spectroscopy (McCarthy et al, 2013;Nakajima et al, 2015), etc. In addition, utilizing the direct detection of CIs, a number of kinetic investigations of CI reactions, e.g., with SO 2 (Huang et al, 2015), water vapor (Chao et al, 2015), alcohols (Chao et al, 2019), thiols (Li et al, 2019), amines (Chhantyal-Pun et al, 2019), carbonyl molecules (Taatjes et al, 2012), and organic (Welz et al, 2014) and inorganic (Foreman et al, 2016) acids, etc., have been reported (Lee, 2015;Osborn and Taatjes, 2015;Lin and Chao, 2017;Khan et al, 2018). 45…”
Section: Ch I → Ch I I ( R 1 )mentioning
confidence: 99%