2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical assessment of steel beams under impact loadings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( ) For dynamic loadings, the strain rate needs to be implemented in the model. From the results obtained in [17], the best way to account for strain rate in FEM modelling is using Johnson-Cook formulation given in Equation (4). Where the DIF is a function of the parameter C and the ratio between the plastic (̇) and the reference static strain rate ( 0 = 0.001).…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( ) For dynamic loadings, the strain rate needs to be implemented in the model. From the results obtained in [17], the best way to account for strain rate in FEM modelling is using Johnson-Cook formulation given in Equation (4). Where the DIF is a function of the parameter C and the ratio between the plastic (̇) and the reference static strain rate ( 0 = 0.001).…”
Section: Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters are fixed according to the targeted impact energy during the test. The testing setup has been used and calibrated in a previous work, all the details are given in [17], where the impact was performed on simply supported beams. All the specimens are identified with an alphanumeric tag, as the one reported in Table 1, where the code is indicating (i) the type of test (IT for Impact Test), (ii) the joint configuration (FR for the joint type called "FREEDAM"), (iii) the number of the test (01, 02, etc.…”
Section: Performed Tests and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among others, cases with high relevance are the collapse of the Ronan Point Building (London, 1968) [7], of the Murrah Federal Building (Oklahoma City, 1995) [8] and the World Trade Center (New York, 2001) [9]. Since the 1940s, many research studies focused on this issue, investigating widely diverse aspects of the problem by performing components [e.g., 10,11,12,13] and large scale experimental tests [e.g., 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], numerical modelling and simulations [e.g., 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31] and investigating several aspects of the design against progressive collapse [e.g., 32,33]. These studies allowed building up an increasingly understanding of the structural response in these scenarios and the definition of possible design strategies nowadays incorporated in design guidelines and codes [e.g., 34,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of laboratory and numerical investigations of dynamic response of beams to the impact of falling mass were carried out by D'Antimo et al [4]. They demonstrated the suitability of calculations for the purpose of estimating the dynamic characteristics of a steel structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%