2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2017.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical hydrodynamic analysis of a stepped planing hull

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, a deeper analysis is required in order to investigate the issues in wetted surface evaluation by comparing the two different wetted surface evaluations, as shown in Table 4. As opposed to what happens in the URANS simulations that, generally, overestimated the wetted surface, as stated in De Marco et al [3], De Luca et al [28], and Mancini et al [29], the 2D + T method underestimates the wetted surface values. In particular, at low Fr, the analytical method fails in the estimation, specifically in the aft wetted surface evaluation.…”
Section: Wetted Surfaces and Wetted Length Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, a deeper analysis is required in order to investigate the issues in wetted surface evaluation by comparing the two different wetted surface evaluations, as shown in Table 4. As opposed to what happens in the URANS simulations that, generally, overestimated the wetted surface, as stated in De Marco et al [3], De Luca et al [28], and Mancini et al [29], the 2D + T method underestimates the wetted surface values. In particular, at low Fr, the analytical method fails in the estimation, specifically in the aft wetted surface evaluation.…”
Section: Wetted Surfaces and Wetted Length Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the 2D + T approach, the 2D + T results are compared with the Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) analysis performed for the same hull model available, with all CFD simulation details, in De Marco et al [3]. Table 3 shows that URANS high-quality simulations can achieve results close to the towing tank tests with an error generally less than 10% for the dynamic trim angle and total resistance.…”
Section: Towing Tank Vs 2d + T Methods Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a work of (Pacuraru and Domnisoru, 2017) barge resistance using RANSE method is presented. Calculation of resistance using RANSE and LES turbulence model of a planing hull is shown in (De Marco et al, 2017). These studies together with author's study are examples of numerical towing tank experiments.…”
Section: Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results show that the 6-DOF solver is suitable for simulating the motion of planing hull under head wave conditions. In 2017, De Marco et al [10] conducted a seakeeping analysis of a stepped planing craft. A hydrodynamic experiment of the single-step hull model, as a new systematic series, was carried out, and the corresponding tests were based on numerical simulation, with an overset and morphing grid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%