2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and numerical investigation of unsteady impingement cooling within a blade leading edge passage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research activity is a collaborative effort between Dr. Ligrani, Professor Jing Ren, Professor Hongde Jiang, and associated graduate students of the Institute for Gas Turbines of Beijing Tsinghua University of the P. R. China. Of interest is experimental and numerical investigation of unsteady impingement cooling within a blade leading edge passage, 44 as well as unsteady structure and development of both laminar and turbulent impingement jets, including Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex development. 45,46 Different turbulence models are also assessed in regard to predictions of narrow passage flows with impingement jets, 47 and with pin fin arrays.…”
Section: Internal Passage Heat Transfer Augmentation Methods and Assomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research activity is a collaborative effort between Dr. Ligrani, Professor Jing Ren, Professor Hongde Jiang, and associated graduate students of the Institute for Gas Turbines of Beijing Tsinghua University of the P. R. China. Of interest is experimental and numerical investigation of unsteady impingement cooling within a blade leading edge passage, 44 as well as unsteady structure and development of both laminar and turbulent impingement jets, including Kelvin-Helmholtz vortex development. 45,46 Different turbulence models are also assessed in regard to predictions of narrow passage flows with impingement jets, 47 and with pin fin arrays.…”
Section: Internal Passage Heat Transfer Augmentation Methods and Assomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each turbulence model possesses its own application scope and limitation. The commonly used turbulence models which were considered for initial comparison with the relevant experimental results were the Realizable k-ε model (Elebiary and Taslim 2011), v 2 -f model (Bhagwat and Sridharan 2016), SST k-ω model (Yang et al 2014), and Transition SST model (Zhang et al 2013). The verification model used was a single impingement jet with detailed experimental data of heat transfer characteristics.…”
Section: Turbulence Modeling Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the research of Li et al [30] also illustrated the k-x SST turbulence model provides the best match to experimental flow and heat transfer results. Yang et al [31] compared the results of experiment and simulation both with steady and unsteady k-x SST model. It was found that the numerical results with the unsteady k-x SST model were in a good agreement with experiment.…”
Section: Selection Of Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the numerical results with the unsteady k-x SST model were in a good agreement with experiment. In order to verify the simulation accuracy, the experiment performed by Yang et al [31] at Re ¼ 15,000 is selected for comparison in the present study. Numerical computations were conducted with steady and unsteady k-x SST models by utilizing the commercial solver ANSYS CFX [32].…”
Section: Selection Of Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%